Mosley v. Richland County Ctr ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 97-7010
    ALBERT MOSLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; JAMES A.
    MCCAULLEY,   Director;   SWANSON   COMMISSARY
    SERVICE; RICHLAND COUNTY; HARRIETTE HALL,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
    (CA-97-731-3-19BC)
    Submitted:   October 23, 1997          Decided:     November 17, 1997
    Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Albert Mosley, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
    without prejudice his civil rights action. The district court's
    dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar
    Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 
    10 F.3d 1064
    , 1066-67 (4th
    Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice could be final if "no
    amendment [to the complaint] could cure defects in the plaintiff's
    case." 
    Id. at 1067
    . In ascertaining whether a dismissal without
    prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine
    "whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending the
    complaint." 
    Id. at 1066-67
    .
    Appellant could refile this action and timely follow the dis-
    trict court's orders regarding change of address and notification
    of desire to prosecute the action, and demonstrating that the
    action is not repetitive. We dismiss the appeal for lack of juris-
    diction because we find the dismissal without prejudice is not
    appealable.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-7010

Filed Date: 11/17/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014