Bradley v. Hinkle ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 97-6400
    JERRY BRADLEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE HINKLE,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
    trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-96-757-R)
    Submitted:   August 14, 1997              Decided:   August 21, 1997
    Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jerry Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assis-
    tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
     (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
    pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Bradley v. Hinkle, No. CA-96-757-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 3, 1997).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
    tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-6400

Filed Date: 8/21/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021