Gut v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    Filed: June 23, 2017
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    KRISTA M. GUT, as Administrator               *      No. 16-1284V
    of the Estate of Jeremy D. Gut,               *
    *
    Petitioner,                    *      Special Master Sanders
    *
    v.                                            *
    *      Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                           *      (“Flu”) Vaccine; Guillain-Barré Syndrome
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                           *      (“GBS”); Death.
    *
    Respondent.                         *
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    Simina Vourlis, Law Offices of Simina Vourlis, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner.
    Douglas Ross, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION1
    On October 6, 2016, Krista M. Gut (“Petitioner”), on behalf of the Estate of Jeremy D.
    Gut, petitioned for compensation pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
    Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2012). Petitioner alleged that, as a result of an
    influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on September 24, 2014, Mr. Gut developed Guillain-
    Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) and subsequently died due to his alleged vaccine-related injury.
    Stipulation, ECF No. 20.
    On June 19, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should
    be entered awarding compensation to Petitioner. 
    Id. Respondent denies
    that the flu vaccine
    1
    This decision shall be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in
    accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
    Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine
    Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information that
    satisfies the criteria in § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a
    motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, the
    undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, such
    material will be deleted from public access.
    2
    The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42
    U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act,” “the Act,” or “the Program”). Hereafter,
    individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act.
    caused Mr. Gut to develop GBS or any other injury, and further denies that the vaccine caused
    his death. 
    Id. at 2.
    Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as
    Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of
    the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
    The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
    A lump sum of $502,691.08 in the form of a check payable to petitioner as legal
    representative of Jeremy D. Gut’s estate. This amount represents compensation for
    all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
    
    Id. at ¶
    8.
    The undersigned approves the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation.
    Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.
    Following Petitioner’s unopposed Motion to Amend Judgment, the clerk of court is
    directed to address Petitioner’s check to “Krista M. Gut, as Administrator of the Estate of Jeremy
    D. Gut, deceased.”3
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
    the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation
    and this decision.4
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Herbrina D. Sanders
    Herbrina D. Sanders
    Special Master
    3
    The clerk of court shall terminate the deadline for Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion to Amend
    Judgment, ECF No. 25.
    4
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
    notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1284

Judges: Herbrina Sanders

Filed Date: 7/21/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/21/2017