Hendricks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 15-850V
    Filed: November 18, 2015
    Unpublished
    ****************************
    JENNIFER HENDRICKS,                     *
    *
    Petitioner,          *    Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    *    Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder
    *    Injury Related to Vaccine
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                     *    Administration (“SIRVA”); Special
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                     *    Processing Unit (“SPU”)
    *
    Respondent.          *
    *
    ****************************
    Curtis R. Webb, counsel for petitioner.
    Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On August 10, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the
    “Vaccine Act”]. Petitioner alleges that as a result of a trivalent influenza (“flu”) vaccine
    she received on October 15, 2014, petitioner developed a shoulder injury related to
    vaccination (SIRVA). Petition at 1. This case was assigned to the Special Processing
    Unit (SPU) of the Office of Special Masters.
    On November 18, 2015, respondent filed the Rule 4(c) report in conceding that
    petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
    Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner’s SIRVA was more likely than not caused
    by the October 15, 2014, flu vaccination,” and that “petitioner has satisfied all legal
    prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 5.
    1
    Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    , 2913 (codified as amended
    at 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-850

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 2/17/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2016