STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. NYGERA ARRINGTON (15-06-1511, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                         NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
    APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
    This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court."
    Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the
    parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
    SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
    APPELLATE DIVISION
    DOCKET NO. A-1080-15T1
    STATE OF NEW JERSEY,
    Plaintiff-Respondent,
    v.
    NYGERA ARRINGTON,
    Defendant-Respondent,
    and
    ANTHONY CRUZ AND FIRST INDEMNITY
    OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY,
    Defendants,
    and
    ALL USA BAIL BONDS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ___________________________________
    Argued October 16, 2017 – Decided October 31, 2017
    Before Judges Messano and Vernoia.
    On appeal from the Superior Court of New
    Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment
    No. 15-06-1511.
    Samuel M.       Silver     argued    the    cause    for
    appellant.
    Respondents have not filed a brief.
    PER CURIAM
    Appellant All USA Bail Bonds appeals from a September 18,
    2015 order denying its motion for exoneration as surety and
    discharge    of   a   $35,000   bond    it    posted     for   defendant    Nygera
    Arrington's release on bail on aggravated assault charges.                  We are
    advised the charges against Arrington have been resolved and that,
    as a result, the bond has been discharged or will be discharged
    upon appellant's request.
    We dismiss the appeal as moot.           See Finkel v. Twp. Comm., 
    434 N.J. Super. 303
    , 315 (App. Div. 2013) ("[O]ur courts often decline
    to review legal questions that have become academic prior to
    judicial scrutiny, out of reluctance to render a decision in the
    abstract on such moot issues and a related desire to conserve
    judicial resources.").      We are also satisfied the issues presented
    are   not   "of   significant    public       importance,"       ibid.,   and   are
    otherwise    fact-sensitive       and        therefore     not     "'capable      of
    repetition, yet evading review' because of the short duration of
    any single plaintiff's interest," 
    ibid.
     (quoting In re Conroy, 
    190 N.J. Super. 453
    , 459 (App. Div. 1983), rev'd on other grounds, 
    98 N.J. 321
     (1985)).
    Dismissed as moot.
    2                                  A-1080-15T1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A-1080-15T1

Filed Date: 10/31/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2017