Thompson, Lawrence Edward ( 2007 )


Menu:
















  • IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

    OF TEXAS




    NO. WR-15,158-19


    LAWRENCE EDWARD THOMPSON, Relator



    v.



    248TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Respondent




    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

    CAUSE NOS. 1036822 THROUGH 1036833

    FROM HARRIS COUNTY


       Per curiam.

    O R D E R  



       Applicant has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of habeas pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he was cited thirteen (13) times for contempt of court by the 248th Judicial District court. He also contends that the trial judge stacked his sentences and that he was sentenced to two-thousand one-hundred and sixty-three (2163) days' confinement in Harris county jail. He alleges that this sentence was excessive in violation of Tex. Gov't Code, § 21.002(h)(1), and he wants this Court to order his immediate release.

    Applicant has alleged facts which, if true, could entitle him to relief. Tex. Gov't Code, § 21.002 specifies that the maximum punishment for contempt of court is eighteen (18) months confinement and Applicant alleges that his punishment exceeded the statutory maximum. See Tex. Gov't Code, § 21.002 (h)(1). This Court has previously granted relief in original writs of habeas corpus from punishments assessed in contempt proceedings. See e.g. Ex parte Taylor, 777 S.W.2d 98 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). The respondent, the judge of the 248th District Court of Harris County, is ordered to forward a copy of the judgments in the contempt proceedings and a transcription of the court reporter's notes from the contempt proceedings to this Court. Also, we invite the respondent to file a response with this Court addressing the following three issues:

    (1) whether this Court has jurisdiction to consider this original application for writ of habeas corpus; (2) whether Applicant's sentence exceeded the statutory maximum as defined in Tex. Gov't Code, § 21.003; and

    (3) whether Applicant's confinement violates his due process rights.

    This application for leave to file a writ of habeas corpus will be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 45 days of the date of this order.



    Filed: April 25, 2007

    Do not publish

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-15,158-19

Filed Date: 4/25/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/15/2015