State v. Dunlap , 31 N.M. 275 ( 1925 )


Menu:
  • Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.

Document Info

DocketNumber: Nos. 2968, 2969, 2979, 2983, 2993, 3040, 3041.

Citation Numbers: 31 N.M. 275, 242 P. 449

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 12/14/1925

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/15/2017