Bishop v. Lea County Comm'rs ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 DONALD RAY BISHOP, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 32,597 5 LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER, 6 DISTRICT 1, JOHN DOE I, 7 LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER, 8 DISTRICT 2, JOHN DOE II, 9 LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER, 10 DISTRICT 3, JOHN DOE III, 11 LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER, 12 DISTRICT 4, JOHN DOE IV, 13 LEA COUNTY COMMISSIONER, 14 DISTRICT 5, JOHN DOE V, 15 Respondents-Appellees. 16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 17 William G. W. Shoobridge, District Judge 18 Donald Ray Bishop 19 Las Cruces, NM 20 Pro se Appellant 21 Maddox, Holloman & Kirksey, P.C. 1 Lee A. Kirksey 2 Hobbs, NM 3 for Appellees 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION 5 WECHSLER, Judge. 6 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 7 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 8 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 9 {2} DISMISSED. 10 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 __________________________________ 12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 13 WE CONCUR: 14 _________________________________ 15 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 16 _________________________________ 17 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

Document Info

Docket Number: 32,597

Filed Date: 7/23/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021