Vinyard v. Palo Alto ( 2013 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 JODY VINYARD, 3 Worker-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 32,832 5 PALO ALTO, D/B/A PIZZA HUT, 6 and MANUFACTURER’S ALLIANCE, 7 Employer/Insurer-Appellee, 8 Law Office of Alvin R. Garcia, LLC 9 Alvin R. Garcia 10 Albuquerque, NM 11 for Appellant 12 Maestas & Suggett, P.C. 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellee 15 APPEAL FROM THE NEW MEXICO WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 16 ADMINISTRATION 17 Reginald C. Woodard, Workers’ Compensation Judge 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION 19 GARCIA, Judge. 1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of proposed 2 disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time 3 for doing so has expired. 4 {2} REVERSED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 11 12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2