Stokes v. NMDT ( 2011 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 DANIEL LESTER STOKES, 8 Worker-Appellant, 9 v. NO. 30,934 10 NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF 11 TRANSPORTATION and STATE OF 12 NEW MEXICO RISK MANAGEMENT, 13 Employer/Insurer-Appellee. 14 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 15 Gregory D. Griego, Workers’ Compensation Judge 16 Tony Couture, 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellant 19 David L. Skinner 20 Albuquerque, NM 21 for Appellee 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION 23 VIGIL, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 AFFIRMED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 2