Anaya v. Rinker ( 2009 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 8 REYNOLDO “RONNIE” ANAYA, 9 Worker-Appellant, 10 v. NO. 29,414 11 RINKER MATERIALS and 12 CRAWFORD INSURANCE CO., 13 Employer/Insurer-Appellee. 14 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 15 Gregory D. Griego, Workers’ Compensation Judge 16 Chavez Law Offices 17 Gene N. Chavez 18 Albuquerque, NM 19 for Appellant 20 Hatch, Allen & Shepherd 21 Kimberly A. Syra 22 Albuquerque, NM 23 for Appellees 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION 25 VIGIL, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance 3 has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 AFFIRMED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 11 12 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 2