Cedrins v. Shrestha ( 2011 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 INARA CEDRINS, 8 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9 v. NO. 30,955 10 RAMESH KUMAR SHRESTHA, 11 Defendant-Appellee. 12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 13 Carl J. Butkus, District Judge 14 Inara Cedrins 15 Chicago, IL 16 Pro Se Appellant 17 Ramesh Kumar Shrestha 18 Albuquerque, NM 19 Pro Se Appellee 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 VIGIL, Judge. 1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 2 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 REVERSED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2