Cohen v. CMC Const. ( 2010 )

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 MIKE COHEN, 8 Worker-Appellant, 9 v. No. 30,336 10 CMC CONSTRUCTION, INC. 11 OF N.M., and BUILDERS TRUST, 12 Employer/Insurer-Appellees. 13 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 14 Terry S. Kramer, District Judge 15 Titus & Murphy Law Firm 16 Victor A. Titus 17 Farmington, NM 18 for Appellant 19 David L. Skinner 20 Albuquerque, NM 21 for Appellees 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION 23 SUTIN, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 AFFIRMED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 ________________________________ 10 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 11 ________________________________ 12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2