Hemberger v. Galey ( 2013 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum
opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain
computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of
Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 ANNETTE HEMBERGER,
3 Petitioner-Appellee,
4 v. NO. 32,563
5 GINIFER GALEY,
6 Respondent-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY
8 Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge
9 Annette Hemberger
10 Santa Fe, NM
11 Pro Se Appellee
12 Knutson Law, P.C.
13 Kristofer C. Knutson
14 Santa Fe, NM
15 Albuquerque, NM
16 for Appellant
17 MEMORANDUM OPINION
18 VANZI, Judge.
1 {1} Partial summary affirmance and partial summary reversal was proposed for the
2 reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum
3 opposing partial summary affirmance and partial summary reversal has been filed and
4 the time for doing so has expired.
5 {2} We are reversing the district court’s finding that “the relationship of the parties
6 is that of an ‘intimate partner’ as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(32).” [RP 19] We are
7 affirming the district court’s order in all other respects.
8 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 __________________________________
10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
11 WE CONCUR:
12 _________________________________
13 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
14 _________________________________
15 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
2