State v. Thrower ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •      This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
    Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum
    opinions.   Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain
    computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of
    Appeals and does not include the filing date.
    1        IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
    2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
    3          Plaintiff-Appellee,
    4 v.                                                                                   No. 35,189
    5 BRANDT THROWER,
    6          Defendant-Appellant.
    7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY
    8 Dalene Marsh, District Judge
    9   Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
    10   Santa Fe, NM
    11   M. Anne Kelly, Assistant Attorney General
    12   Albuquerque, NM
    13 for Appellee
    14 Tyson Quail
    15 Farmington, NM
    16 for Appellant
    17                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
    18 BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
    1   {1}   Having entered a conditional plea in magistrate court, Defendant Brandt
    2 Thrower appealed to the district court for review of the denial of his motion to
    3 dismiss. The district court also denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss, [RP 30] and
    4 this appeal followed. Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the
    5 notice of proposed disposition filed on April 15, 2016. On May 16, 2016, the State
    6 filed a response to our proposed disposition noting its intention not to file a
    7 memorandum in opposition. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s denial of
    8 Defendant’s motion to dismiss for the reasons stated in this Court’s notice of proposed
    9 disposition. In addition, consistent with the procedures set forth in State v. Celusniak,
    10 
    2004-NMCA-070
    , ¶¶ 8-15, 
    135 N.M. 728
    , 
    93 P.3d 10
    , we remand to the district court
    11 so that it may issue an order of remand to the magistrate court permitting Defendant
    12 to withdraw his conditional plea.
    13   {2}   IT IS SO ORDERED.
    14
    15                                     _______________________________________
    16                                     MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
    17 WE CONCUR:
    18
    19 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
    2
    1
    2 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 35,189

Filed Date: 6/7/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021