Sartori v. Townsend Realty ( 2018 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 ROBERT F. SARTORI, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. NO. A-1-CA-37128 5 TOWNSEND REALTY, SECURITY 6 ESCROW CORPORATION, 7 PHYLLIS L. TOWNSEND, 8 MELVIN L. TOWNSEND, 9 MELVIN BRADLEY TOWNSEND, 10 RIC THOM, 11 Defendants-Appellees, 12 and 13 REAL ESTATE LAW ASSOCIATES 14 and PETER E. SPRINGER, 15 Defendants. 16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TORRANCE COUNTY 17 Shannon Murdock, District Judge 18 Robert F. Sartori 19 McIntosh, NM 20 Pro Se Appellant 21 Hatch Law Firm, LLC 1 Jesse Clark Hatch 2 Albuquerque, NM 3 for Appellees Townsend Realty and Melvin Bradley Townsend 4 Garcia Law Group, LLC 5 Bryan Christopher Garcia 6 Albuquerque, NM 7 for Appellees Security Escrow Corporation and Ric Thom 8 The Garrison Law Firm, LLC 9 Jacob A. Garrison 10 Albuquerque, NM 11 for Appellees Phyllis L. Townsend and Melvin L. Townsend 12 Brant & Hunt, Attorneys 13 John M. Brant 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 for Defendants Real Estate Law Associates and Peter E. Springer 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 VIGIL, Judge. 18 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 19 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 20 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 21 {2} DISMISSED. 22 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 1 _______________________________ 2 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 3 WE CONCUR: 4 ___________________________________ 5 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 6 _________________________________ 7 EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge 3