Harvey's Appeal , 35 Pa. 207 ( 1860 )

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Woodward, J.

It is not necessary to discuss the effect of the deed of revocation, because the auditor ruled rightly, that Marshall Harvey took an absolute interest in the two-thirds of the surplus of the assigned estate. And that decides the only question on the record. If any authorities are necessary to be added to those cited by the auditor, they will be found collected in Smith’s Appeal, 12 Harris Id. 389; 9 Casey 85.

The decree is affirmed.