Hamm v. Jones , 2018 Ohio 4948 ( 2018 )

[Cite as Hamm v. Jones, 2018-Ohio-4948.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
REBEKAH HAMM, : OPINION
Plaintiff, :
CASE NO. 2018-A-0047
ASHTABULA COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT :
ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,
:
Appellee,
:
- vs -
:
KIERAN I. JONES,
:
Defendant-Appellant.
Civil Appeal from the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division.
Case No. 2011 JI 00259.
Judgment: Modified and affirmed as modified.
Terry C. Weddleton, Ashtabula County Child Support Enforcement Agency, 2924
Donahoe Drive, Ashtabula, OH 44004 (For Appellee).
Rebecca R. Grabski, 206 South Meridian Street, Suite B, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For
Defendant-Appellant).
TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J.
{¶1} Appellant, Kieran I. Jones, appeals from the May 16, 2018 judgment entry
of the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division. Appellant was
ordered to serve 30 days in jail with 15 days suspended for his failure to pay child support.
The trial court’s judgment is modified and affirmed as modified.
{¶2} On October 24, 2011, upon a motion filed by appellee, the Ashtabula
County Child Support Enforcement Agency (“ACCSEA”), the Ashtabula County Court of
Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, issued an order for child support consistent with the
ACCSEA’s August 3, 2011 administrative order. Appellant was ordered to pay child
support for his minor child, K.J., in the amount of $225.30 per month plus administrative
fees, commencing September 3, 2011.
{¶3} Pursuant to a motion to modify support filed by ACCSEA, on April 22, 2014,
the trial court adopted an administrative order modifying appellant’s support obligation.
The trial court ordered that commencing February 1, 2014, appellant pay child support in
the amount of $185.93 per month. The trial court further ordered appellant pay “$37.19
plus 2% processing charge towards the arrears until all arrears are paid in full.”
{¶4} On May 5, 2014, ACCSEA filed a motion to show cause, requesting the trial
court order appellant to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for his failure
to pay his child support obligation. As of April 10, 2014, appellant owed $6,916.72 in
arrears. Appellant was ordered to appear on July 8, 2014, to answer the charge of
contempt. A warrant was issued for his arrest after appellant failed to appear.
{¶5} Appellant was arrested, and on April 27, 2015, a hearing before the
magistrate was held to address the motion to show cause. After being advised of his
rights, appellant waived his right to counsel. The parties reached an agreement during
the hearing which was later set forth in a magistrate’s decision filed July 7, 2015. The
magistrate’s decision states, in pertinent part:
1. [ACCSEA] shall reinstate Obligor’s driver’s license, immediately,
and shall not re-suspend during the purge period.
2
2. That Obligor be found in contempt for failure to pay support as
ordered.
3. That Obligor be found in default of his support obligation in the
amount of $8235.76 including processing charges, as of 3/31/15.
4. That the current order of support is $185.93 per month plus
processing charge.
5. That Obligor be permitted to purge himself of contempt by paying
$37.19 per month towards arrears in addition to current support as
ordered. The purge period shall commence 5/1/15. A purge hearing
shall be set every 90 days for 9 months. If Obligor fails to pay as
ordered during purge period, the matter shall be set for sentencing.
ACCSEA reserves the right to move for earlier sentencing hearing if
Obligor fails to pay as ordered for over 30 consecutive days during
the purge period. However, if the Obligor is laid off due to no fault of
his own, he shall avoid jail time by providing documentation that the
layoff was not his fault and by seeking work at twenty (20) places per
month and keeping lists of his efforts to present to the court at
hearing. [Emphasis removed.]
{¶6} After neither party filed objections, the trial court adopted the magistrate’s
decision on August 6, 2015.
{¶7} A purge hearing was held on September 30, 2015, at which neither party
appeared. In a magistrate’s order filed October 21, 2015, the magistrate found appellant
failed to make payments required to purge himself of contempt for the purge period.
However, the magistrate rescheduled the purge hearing for January 13, 2016, due to
appellant’s multiple pending criminal cases.
{¶8} A magistrate’s order filed on February 13, 2016, indicates the parties failed
to appear for the January 13, 2016 hearing. The order further states: “Obligor has failed
to make the payments required to purge himself of contempt for this purge period. Obligor
failed to seek work as ordered, or at least failed to prove he sought work. He is
incarcerated now, but with credit for time served, will be released in about 10 months.
3
Accordingly, the Magistrate will keep it on her docket.” The purge hearing was
rescheduled for December 21, 2016.
{¶9} The parties again failed to appear at the rescheduled hearing. A
magistrate’s order filed on January 23, 2017, states: “Obligor has failed to make the
payments required to purge himself of contempt for this purge period. He was released
from prison on 8/16/16.” The magistrate set a sentencing hearing for March 29, 2017.
{¶10} Appellant failed to appear for the sentencing hearing, and a warrant was
issued for his arrest. A magistrate’s order filed March 29, 2017, states: “The ACCSEA
reports that the Obligor owes $12,805.12 as of March 29, 2017 inclusive of the
administrative fee. The ACCSEA reports that the Obligor has failed to pay child support
as ordered and failed to appear today to explain what he has completed since release
from prison on August 16, 2016.”
{¶11} Appellant appeared on his own on April 12, 2017, for sentencing. The trial
court’s judgment entry filed the same day, states: “The ACCSEA reports that the Obligor
owes $12,995.51 as of April 10, 2017 inclusive of administrative fee. The ACCSEA
reports that the Obligor has failed to make any payment of child support as ordered since
March 2015.” Appellant provided documentation indicating he was employed but was not
working due to a non-work-related injury. Appellant was ordered to make his child support
payments once he resumed work. The matter was rescheduled for a “Review of
Sentencing” on August 23, 2017, “to assure payments are made.”
{¶12} Appellant appeared for the sentencing hearing on August 23, 2017. A
judgment entry filed by the trial court on the same day states: “The ACCSEA reports that
the Obligor owes $13,587.07 as of August 21, 2017 inclusive of administrative fee. The
4
ACCSEA reports that the Obligor has made some small payments while he is attending
school to complete his CDL[.] * * * The Obligor also submitted evidence that he was on
medical leave for hernia surgery for 9 weeks commencing April 17, 2017.” The matter
was rescheduled for a “Review Sentencing” on December 13, 2017. Appellant was
ordered to “bring to Court proof of his CDL progress and his Seek Work Lists where he
has applied for employment.”
{¶13} Appellant failed to appear on December 13, 2017. The trial court’s
judgment entry states that the ACCSEA reported that appellant owed $14,298.63 “as of
December 13, 2017 inclusive of administrative fee.” Appellant had made “some small
sporadic payments but failed to pay as ordered and failed to appear today and explain.”
A warrant was issued for appellant’s arrest.
{¶14} A judgment entry filed on February 1, 2018, states that on January 19, 2018,
appellant filed for a modification of child support. The matter was scheduled for a
modification review hearing on April 4, 2018. The trial court further ordered that appellant
“address the issue of the outstanding warrant that was issued in this matter on December
13, 2017, for failure to appear for Child Support hearing, and comply with child support
order.”
{¶15} On February 8, 2018, appellant turned himself in on the warrant issued in
December 2018. The ACCSEA reported that appellant owed $14,489.02 as of January
31, 2018, and that appellant failed to pay any child support since September 18, 2017.
The court scheduled the matter for a sentencing hearing on May 16, 2018.
{¶16} On April 4, 2018, appellant failed to appear for the modification review
hearing, and his motion for modification was dismissed.
5
{¶17} Appellant appeared for the May 16, 2018 sentencing hearing with counsel.
The trial court’s judgment entry filed the same day indicates ACCSEA reported that
appellant owed $14,490.19 as of April 30, 2018; appellant had made partial payments
since “the last hearing”; and appellant was employed part-time. The judgment entry
further states; in part:
The Court hereby sentences the Obligor * * * to serve 30 days in the
Ashtabula County Jail for failure to support his child, with 15 days
suspended. The remaining 15 days shall be furloughed and Obligor
is ordered to report to the Ashtabula County Jail on October 2, 2018
at 9:00 a.m. to serve his sentence. * * *
The Obligor may request an Extension of a Jail Report date by filing
a Motion with proof of payment no less than thirty (30) days prior to
the jail report date if he has paid future child support as ordered. * *
* The mere filing of such a Motion shall NOT serve to excuse any
failure to report to jail. * * *
{¶18} Appellant noticed a timely appeal. He asserts two assignments of error,
which we address together. The assignments of error state:
[1.] The trial court abused its discretion by finding Appellant-Obligor
in contempt for failure to support his child.
[2.] The trial court committed reversible error in finding Appellant-
Obligor in contempt as it was against the manifest weight of the
evidence presented at the hearing.
{¶19} In his appellate brief, appellant states: “On May 16, 2018, the Ashtabula
County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, held a sentencing hearing on whether
or not [appellant] was in contempt of a court order.”1 Under his first assignment of error,
1. Appellant’s brief makes no reference to the trial court’s finding of contempt in the August 6, 2015
judgment entry. Appellant addresses the motion to show cause filed May 5, 2014, by stating: “A Motion to
Show Cause was filed May 2, 2014 by ACCSEA for Appellant-Obligor’s failure to pay child support to which
Appellant-Obligor did not appear. A warrant was issued for his arrest on July 24, 2014. Appellant-Obligor
was picked upon on the warrant and released on April 27, 2015. The pending Motion to Show Cause was
resolved and a Purge hearing was set for December 22, 2016.”
6
appellant maintains that the trial court made a finding of contempt at the May 16, 2018
sentencing hearing and failed to order purge conditions. In his second assignment of
error, appellant maintains the finding of contempt made on May 16, 2018, was against
the manifest weight of the evidence because appellant was making partial payments.
Appellant further argues that at the May 16, 2018 hearing, he was not afforded an
opportunity to rebut the allegations against him and present the defense of inability to
pay.
{¶20} Appellee contends appellant’s arguments “must be rejected” because the
finding of contempt was not made in the May 16, 2018 judgment entry which is the subject
of this appeal. Appellee maintains appellant agreed to the finding of contempt, reflected
in the July 7, 2015 magistrate’s decision, which was adopted by the trial court in its August
6, 2015 judgment entry.
{¶21} Appellant failed to file a transcript of the May 16, 2018 sentencing hearing.
“The duty to provide a transcript for appellate review falls upon the appellant. This is
necessarily so because an appellant bears the burden of showing error by reference to
matters in the record.” Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197, 199 (1980)
(citation omitted). “When portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of assigned
errors are omitted from the record, the reviewing court has nothing to pass upon and thus,
as to those assigned errors, the court has no choice but to presume the validity of the
lower court’s proceedings, and affirm.” Id. The judgment of the trial court must stand
unless the errors alleged on appeal are apparent on the face of the judgment entry. State
v. Render, 43 Ohio St.2d 17, 21 (1975).
7
{¶22} The record reflects that the trial court made a finding of contempt in its
August 6, 2015 judgment entry. Subsequently, multiple magistrate’s orders were filed
indicating appellant failed to meet his purge conditions. The magistrate ultimately
scheduled a sentencing hearing. Multiple sentencing hearings were held. The judgment
entry from each sentencing hearing reflects the trial court repeatedly addressed
appellant’s continuing failure to pay child support. However, the May 16, 2018 judgment
entry does not state that a second finding of contempt was made. The record does not
support appellant’s assigned errors that assumes a second finding of contempt.
{¶23} Appellant’s first and second assignments of error are without merit.
{¶24} However, the trial court’s May 16, 2018 judgment entry is unclear about
whether appellant was sentenced for the finding of contempt from August 6, 2015, or
whether he was sentenced for nonpayment of support that occurred after the contempt
finding. The trial court was not permitted to punish appellant for conduct that occurred
after the initial finding of contempt without making a new contempt finding. See Kungle
v. Kungle, 5th Dist. Stark No. 2006CA00367, 2007-Ohio-4929, ¶20-21. “‘[A]ny effort to
punish a future violation of the support order would require new notice, hearing, and
determination.’” Id. at ¶20, quoting Tucker v. Tucker, 10 Ohio App.3d 251, 252 (10th
Dist.1983). Accordingly, the May 16, 2018 judgment is affirmed to the extent it punishes
appellant pursuant to the finding of contempt in the August 6, 2015 judgment entry for
nonpayment of child support as of March 31, 2015. The record is clear the trial court
found appellant failed to pay child support prior to the entry of contempt on August 6,
2015, and appellant did not appeal from or otherwise challenge that order. The May 16,
8
2018 judgment entry is modified to clarify that appellant is sentenced pursuant to the
finding of contempt of August 6, 2015, which contempt occurred prior to that date.
{¶25} The judgment of the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile
Division, is modified and affirmed as modified.
CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., concurs,
COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., concurs in judgment only.
9