-
Motion, insofar as it seeks reconsideration of this Court’s January 11, 1996 order, dismissed as untimely [see, 87 NY2d 911]; motion, insofar as it seeks reargument of appellant’s motion for leave to appeal decided by order of the Court of Appeals dated May 2, 1996, denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [see, 88 NY2d 866]. Cross motion by respondents for sanctions denied.
*836 Judge Ciparick taking no part.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 89 N.Y.2d 835
Filed Date: 11/14/1996
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023