Titus v. Shaffer , 110 A.D.2d 772 ( 1985 )

Petitioner’s conviction for petit larceny and his false answer to question 18 on his renewal application supported the determination to revoke petitioner’s license (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). We find no merit to petitioner’s various other contentions. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.