STILTS, BRANDON, PEOPLE v ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •            SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    833
    KA 10-01454
    PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
    V                               MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    BRANDON STILTS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    CHRISTOPHER S. BRADSTREET, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    JOHN C. TUNNEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (AMANDA M. CHAFEE OF COUNSEL),
    FOR RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Marianne
    Furfure, A.J.), rendered April 10, 2009. The judgment revoked
    defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of
    imprisonment.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed.
    Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the term
    of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of rape in the
    second degree (Penal Law § 130.30 [1]) and sentencing him to a
    determinate term of incarceration, following a hearing on the issue
    whether he violated the conditions of his probation. We reject
    defendant’s contention that County Court erred in denying his request
    for substitution of counsel. The record establishes that the court
    “made the requisite inquiry to determine whether defendant had good
    cause for substitution” (People v Henderson, 77 AD3d 1311, 1311), and
    “ ‘thereafter reasonably concluded that defendant’s . . . objections
    had no merit or substance’ ” (id.). The denial of a defendant’s
    request for substitution of assigned counsel does not constitute an
    abuse of the court’s discretion where, as in this case, “tensions
    between client and counsel on the eve of [a hearing] were the
    precipitate of differences over strategy” (People v Medina, 44 NY2d
    199, 208; see People v Shorter, 6 AD3d 1204, 1205, lv denied 3 NY3d
    648). We reject defendant’s further contention that he was denied
    effective assistance of counsel (see generally People v Baldi, 54 NY2d
    137, 147). Finally, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh
    or severe.
    Entered:   July 1, 2011                            Patricia L. Morgan
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KA 10-01454

Filed Date: 7/1/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016