Hoag v. Hudson River Day Line , 219 A.D. 830 ( 1927 )


Menu:
  • Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint states a cause of action for willful misrepresentation. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 219 A.D. 830

Filed Date: 3/15/1927

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023