Hughes v. Realty Accumulating Co. , 219 A.D. 831 ( 1927 )

Judgment reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, because of errors made by the trial court in excluding plaintiff’s testimony upon the theory that there could be no recovery on the contracts alleged for the services rendered, in the absence of proof of the adoption of a formal resolution by the board of directors employing the plaintiff. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.