United States v. Centeno ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Case: 21-40347     Document: 00516464815         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/08/2022
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Fifth Circuit                             United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    September 8, 2022
    No. 21-40347
    Summary Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
    Clerk
    United States of America,
    Plaintiff—Appellee,
    versus
    Heber Centeno,
    Defendant—Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:14-CR-81-10
    Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam:*
    Heber Centeno, federal prisoner # 65426-179, appeals the denial of his
    motion for compassionate release under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(1)(A), which
    was based on his contention that harsh prison conditions; his obesity,
    hypertension, and depression, which put him at greater risk of hospitalization
    *
    Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
    opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
    circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
    Case: 21-40347      Document: 00516464815           Page: 2    Date Filed: 09/08/2022
    No. 21-40347
    and death from COVID-19; and his lengthy sentence were extraordinary and
    compelling reasons warranting early release.
    We decline to reach the Government’s argument that Centeno failed
    to exhaust his administrative remedies given that the Government did not
    appeal the district court’s order finding that exhaustion was satisfied. See
    Greenlaw v. United States, 
    554 U.S. 237
    , 244-45 (2008); United States v.
    Ibarra-Luna, 
    628 F.3d 712
    , 715 & n.16 (5th Cir. 2010).
    We review the denial of a motion for compassionate release for an
    abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss, 
    948 F.3d 691
    , 693 (5th
    Cir. 2020). Contrary to Centeno’s contention, the district court did not
    misapply the relevant factors when it denied relief, given that it considered
    his age and that his current health conditions were being managed by
    Centeno and the Bureau of Prisons. See United States v. Rodriguez, 
    27 F.4th 1097
    , 1099-1101 & n.2 (5th Cir. 2022); United States v. 
    Thompson, 984
     F.3d
    431, 433-35 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    141 S. Ct. 2688
     (2021).
    Accordingly, Centeno has failed to show that the district court abused
    its discretion in denying his motion for compassionate release. See Rodriguez,
    27 F.4th at 1100-01; 
    Thompson, 984
     F.3d at 433-35; Chambliss, 948 F.3d at
    693. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-40347

Filed Date: 9/8/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/9/2022