Daniel Hernandez v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 2, 2018.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-18-00552-CR
    NO. 14-18-00553-CR
    DANIEL HERNANDEZ, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 179th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. 1514852 & 1514853
    MEMORANDUM                      OPINION
    Appellant was indicted for two counts of indecency with a child by contact.
    Pursuant to a charge bargain, the State agreed to reduce the charges in exchange for
    appellant’s guilty pleas to two counts of indecency with a child by exposure. The
    trial court placed appellant on deferred-adjudication community supervision for
    eight years in each case with the sentences to run concurrently. We dismiss the
    appeals.
    Because this is a charge-bargain case, appellant has the right to appeal under
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) only: (A) those matters that were
    raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after receiving the
    trial court’s permission to appeal. Kennedy v. State, 
    297 S.W.3d 338
    , 340–41 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 2009); see also Shankle v. State, 
    119 S.W.3d 808
    , 812–13 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2003) (holding that charge bargain that “effectively puts a cap on punishment”
    is a bargain governed by rule of appellate procedure 25.2(a)(2)). The record does not
    reflect the trial court’s permission to appeal or any pretrial motions that could be
    appealed.
    In cause number 14-18-00553-CR, the trial court entered a certification of the
    defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea-bargain
    case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The
    trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
    25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
    In cause number 14-18-00552-CR. the trial court erroneously entered a
    certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this
    is not a plea bargain case and the defendant has the right of appeal.On August 10,
    2018, this court sent notice to the trial court requesting a corrected certification of
    appellant’s right to appeal in cause number 14-18-00552-CR. No corrected
    certification has been filed.
    Despite the incorrect certification, we do not have jurisdiction of appellant’s
    appeal. See Waters v. State, 
    124 S.W.3d 825
    , 826–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th
    Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d) (holding reviewing court lacked jurisdiction where defendant
    pled guilty with a sentencing cap of ten years, even though trial judge mistakenly
    certified defendant had right of appeal).
    2
    Accordingly, we dismiss both appeals.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Busby.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-18-00553-CR

Filed Date: 10/2/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/3/2018