Farewell v. State , 553 S.W.3d 892 ( 2018 )

PER CURIAM.

*893Roderick Farewell appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).