Comstock v. Gas Co. , 2 Pa. Super. 184 ( 1896 )


Menu:
  • Opinion by

    Orlady, J.,

    In Prichard v. The Consolidated Gas Co. the reasons are given for affirming the judgments, and as the testimony is the *185same in these cases it is not deemed necessary to add to what lias been therein said. The assignments of error are not sustained and the judgments are affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 57; Appeal, No. 58

Citation Numbers: 2 Pa. Super. 184

Judges: Beaver, Orlady, Reeder, Rice, Smith, Wickham, Willard

Filed Date: 7/16/1896

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2022