James Peggs v. Brian Shipwash ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-1363
    JAMES RONALD PEGGS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    BRIAN SHIPWASH; DAVID WILSON & ROSSABI BLACK SLAUGHTER,
    P.A.; ARRON B. ANDERSON TRUSTEE SERVICE OF CAROLINA LLC;
    BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC; US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
    a/k/a US Bank National Association; WELLS FARGO HOME
    MORTGAGE, a/k/a Wells Fargo Bank Association; SURETY
    INSURANCE COMPANY,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.   Robert J. Conrad,
    Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00278-RJC)
    Submitted:   October 21, 2016               Decided:   November 1, 2016
    Before SHEDD and      THACKER,   Circuit   Judges,   and   DAVIS,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    James Ronald Peggs, Appellant Pro Se.    Kathryn Hicks Shields,
    Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Emily
    Jeffords Meister, Jennifer Lynn Reutter, BLACK SLAUGHTER &
    BLACK, P.A., Greensboro, North Carolina; Franklin Lamont Greene,
    BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; B. Chad Ewing,
    WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE     &   RICE,   PLLC,   Charlotte,   North
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    James    Ronald      Peggs   appeals      the    district      court’s    order
    dismissing      his     civil    complaint      for    lack   of   subject      matter
    jurisdiction and a subsequent order denying reconsideration.                        We
    have     reviewed     the       record    and   find     no   reversible        error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.     Peggs v. Shipwash, No. 3:15-cv-00278-RJC (W.D.N.C. Mar.
    3, 2016; Mar. 30, 2016).            We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials      before    this     court   and   argument      would    not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1363

Filed Date: 11/1/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021