United States v. Familia ( 1995 )

USCA1 Opinion

          November 14, 1995

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT







                                 ____________________





        No. 95-1447



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                                JUAN CONSORO FAMILIA,



                                Defendant, Appellant.





                                 ____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND





                 [Hon. Francis J. Boyle, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,

                                   Circuit Judges.
______________



                                 ____________________



            Juan Consoro Familia on brief pro se.
____________________

            Sheldon  Whitehouse,  United   States  Attorney,  and  Kenneth  P.
___________________                                    ___________

        Madden, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
______





                                 ____________________





                                 ____________________





































































































































































                      Per Curiam.  Defendant Juan Consoro Familia appeals
__________



            a district court order  that denied his motion to  reduce his



            sentence  for  lack  of  jurisdiction.   We  have  thoroughly



            reviewed  the record and the  parties' briefs on  appeal.  We



            conclude that the district court's analysis is correct, hence



            we  summarily affirm  on  the basis  of the  district court's
______



            order.



                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.
________   ___











































































                                         -2-