-
The court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to a writ of mandamus as prayed for in the petition, for the reason that the transaction is one in which other persons are concerned and other interests involved, and the relief sought cannot be afforded by a writ of mandamus.
Writ denied.
MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., concur. *Page 699
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 19037
Citation Numbers: 150 N.E. 755, 113 Ohio St. 698, 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 698
Filed Date: 6/16/1925
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023