Disciplinary Counsel v. Lynch , 130 Ohio St. 3d 1206 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lynch, 
    130 Ohio St.3d 1206
    , 
    2011-Ohio-5410
    .]
    DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LYNCH.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lynch, 
    130 Ohio St.3d 1206
    , 
    2011-Ohio-5410
    .]
    Attorneys at law—Reciprocal discipline from the State Bar of Arizona—Public
    Reprimand—Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4).
    (No. 2011-1190—Submitted October 5, 2011—Decided October 14, 2011.)
    ON CERTIFIED ORDER of the Supreme Court of Arizona, No. 10-0651.
    __________________
    {¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in
    accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F).
    {¶ 2} On July 8, 2011, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this court
    a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered March 8,
    2011, in In re a Non-Member of the State Bar of Arizona, in Case No. 10-0651,
    admonishing respondent, David M. Lynch. On July 25, 2011, this court ordered
    respondent to show cause why identical or comparable discipline should not be
    imposed in this state. Respondent filed a response to the show cause order, and
    relator filed a reply to the response.
    {¶ 3} On consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court
    that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), respondent, David Marlborough Lynch,
    Attorney 
    Registration No. 0006380,
     last known business address in Wickliffe,
    Ohio, is publicly reprimanded.
    {¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court, that within 90 days of
    the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been
    awarded against respondent by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R.
    VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered by the court that if, after the date of this order, the
    Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against respondent pursuant to
    SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
    Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients’
    Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award.
    {¶ 5} It is further ordered that service shall be deemed made on
    respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified
    mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Office of Attorney
    Services.
    {¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
    of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made
    as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of
    publication.
    O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
    LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
    ______________________
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2011-1190

Citation Numbers: 2011 Ohio 5410, 130 Ohio St. 3d 1206

Judges: Brown, Cupp, Lanzinger, Lundberg, McGee, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Pfeifer, Stratton

Filed Date: 10/14/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2023