State v. Hursong , 2019 Ohio 86 ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Hursong, 2019-Ohio-86.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    WARREN COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                    :
    Appellee,                                 :      CASE NO. CA2018-05-053
    :             DECISION
    - vs -                                                         1/14/2019
    :
    MICHAEL D. HURSONG,                               :
    Appellant.                                :
    CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    Case No. 18CR33862
    David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Kirsten A. Brandt, 520 Justice
    Drive, Lebanon, OH 45036, for appellee
    Engel & Martin LLC, Mary K. Martin, Suite 101, 4660 Duke Drive, Mason, OH 45040, for
    appellant
    Per Curiam.
    {¶1}     This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
    appellant, Michael D. Hursong, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript
    of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and
    upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
    {¶2}     Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of
    Warren CA2018-05-053
    the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court
    prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;
    (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 
    744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400
    ; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine
    whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of
    appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for
    appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both
    the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
    {¶3}    Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
    been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
    appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
    requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason
    that it is wholly frivolous.
    S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.
    -2-
    [Cite as State v. Hursong, 2019-Ohio-86.]
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2018-05-053

Citation Numbers: 2019 Ohio 86

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 1/14/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/14/2019