State v. Donaldson , 2014 Ohio 5558 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Donaldson, 2014-Ohio-5558.]
    Court of Appeals of Ohio
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    No. 101974
    STATE OF OHIO
    RESPONDENT
    vs.
    LONNIE L. DONALDSON
    PETITIONER
    JUDGMENT:
    PETITION DISMISSED
    Writ of Habeas Corpus
    Motion No. 479034
    Order No. 479579
    RELEASE DATE: December 12, 2014
    ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
    Vicki L. Ward
    Shayla Alexandra King
    Attorneys at Law
    75 Public Square
    Cleveland, Ohio 44113
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
    Timothy J. McGinty
    Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
    By: Daniel T. Van
    Assistant Prosecuting Attorney
    Justice Center - 9th Floor
    1200 Ontario Street
    Cleveland, Ohio 44113
    KENNETH A. ROCCO, J.:
    {¶1} On September 26, 2014, Lonnie Donaldson, filed a “Motion for leave to plead and
    petition for writ of habeas corpus.” He avers that he is being held on excessive bail in the
    underlying case, State v. Donaldson, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-07-502443-A, in which the trial
    court recently set bond at $750,000.00 for charges of aggravated murder and attempted murder.
    For the following reasons, this court dismisses the petition, sua sponte.
    {¶2} Donaldson’s petition is not verified as required by R.C. 2725.04. In Chari v. Vore,
    
    91 Ohio St. 3d 323
    , 2001-Ohio-49, 
    744 N.E.2d 763
    , the Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the
    court of appeals’ granting of the writ and awarding of relief and held that the cause should have
    been summarily dismissed because the petition was not verified.             Additionally, Donaldson
    failed to support his complaint with an affidavit “specifying the details of the claim” as required
    by Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a). State ex rel. Leon v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 
    123 Ohio St. 3d 124
    , 2009-Ohio-4688, 
    914 N.E.2d 402
    .
    {¶3} Donaldson improperly captioned his petition.            He used the caption for his
    underlying case as the caption for his habeas corpus petition. Thus, the state of Ohio is listed as
    plaintiff-respondent. However, “the individual who has actual legal custody over the inmate is
    the only proper respondent in a habeas corpus action.”         Rockwell v. Geauga Cty. Court of
    Common Pleas, 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2005-G-2661, 2005-Ohio-5762, ¶ 7; R.C. 2725.04(B);
    and Boyd v. McGinty, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 84476, 2004-Ohio-2704.
    {¶4} Donaldson has also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25, which requires an affidavit
    that describes each civil action or appeal filed by the relator within the previous five years in any
    state or federal court. This failure also warrants dismissal of his petition. State ex rel. Zanders
    v. Ohio Parole Bd., 
    82 Ohio St. 3d 421
    , 1998-Ohio-218, 
    696 N.E.2d 594
    and State ex rel. Alford
    v. Winters, 
    80 Ohio St. 3d 285
    , 1997-Ohio-117, 
    685 N.E.2d 1242
    .
    {¶5} Accordingly, the court dismisses the petition for habeas corpus.   Costs assessed
    against the relator. This court directs the Clerk of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals to
    serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R.
    58(B).
    {¶6} Petition dismissed.
    __________________________________
    KENNETH A. ROCCO, JUDGE
    LARRY A. JONES, SR., P.J., and
    PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J., CONCUR
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 101974

Citation Numbers: 2014 Ohio 5558

Judges: Rocco

Filed Date: 12/12/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/18/2014