State v. Hassell , 2012 Ohio 3598 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Hassell, 
    2012-Ohio-3598
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    GREENE COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    DAVID M. HASSELL
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appellate Case No. 2011-CA-69
    Trial Court Case No. 2011-CR-342
    (Criminal Appeal from
    (Common Pleas Court)
    ...........
    DECISION AND ENTRY
    Rendered on the 10th day of August, 2012.
    ...........
    PER CURIAM:
    {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant David M. Hassell appeals from his eleven-month sentence
    imposed for Violation of a Protection Order, in violation of R.C. 2919.27(A)(1), a felony of the fifth
    degree. Hassell contends that the sentence constitutes an abuse of discretion.
    {¶ 2} Not including one conviction for housing violations, according to the pre-sentence
    investigation report, Hassell has been convicted of criminal offenses on 30 separate occasions before
    2
    this conviction, most of which have been either for indecent exposure, driving without a valid
    driver’s license, or driving while under the influence. Furthermore, Hassell was on community
    control sanctions when he committed this offense.                                Therefore, Hassell’s argument that his
    eleven-month sentence is an abuse of discretion is a difficult one to make.
    {¶ 3} But we find it unnecessary to decide this appeal. Hassell requested and obtained
    three extensions of time to file his brief before filing it on April 30, 2012. According to the Ohio
    Adult Parole Authority, Hassell was released from prison just nine days later, on May 9, 2012;
    although post-release control was optional for this offense, he was not subject to post-release control
    when he was released.1 Hassell never sought a stay of his sentence.
    {¶ 4} There is no meaningful relief that we can provide Hassell on appeal. He has already
    completed his sentence, and he is not challenging the propriety of his plea of guilty to the charge.
    This appeal is moot, and it is therefore DISMISSED.
    {¶ 5} IT IS SO ORDERED.
    MIKE FAIN, Judge
    MARY E. DONOVAN, Judge
    JEFFREY E. FROELICH, Judge
    1
    An officer of this court telephoned the Ohio Adult Parole Authority on July 25, 2012, and elicited this information.
    3
    Copies mailed to:
    Stephen K. Haller
    Stephanie R. Hayden
    Greene Co Prosecutor’s Office
    61 Greene Street
    Xenia, OH 45385
    Brian A. Smith
    503 W. Park Avenue
    Barberton, OH 44203
    Hon. Stephen Wolaver
    Greene County CPC
    45 N. Detroit Street
    Xenia, OH 45385-2998
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2011-CA-69

Citation Numbers: 2012 Ohio 3598

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 8/10/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/3/2016