State ex rel. Joseph v. Perry Cty. Court , 2014 Ohio 4717 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State ex rel. Joseph v. Perry Cty. Court, 
    2014-Ohio-4717
    .]
    COURT OF APPEALS
    PERRY COUNTY, OHIO
    FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    STATE OF OHIO, ex rel.                                       JUDGES:
    DAVID A. JOSEPH, SR.                                         Hon. John W. Wise, P. J.
    Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.
    Relator                                              Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.
    -vs-                                                         Case No. 14 CA 15
    PERRY COUNTY COURT
    OPINION
    Respondent
    CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING:                                 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
    JUDGMENT:                                                Dismissed
    DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY:                                  October 23, 2014
    APPEARANCES:
    For Relator                                              For Respondent
    DAVID A. JOSEPH, SR., PRO SE                             No Appearance
    A626391
    Grafton Correctional Institution
    2500 South Avon Beldon Road
    Grafton, OHio 44044
    Perry County, Case No. 14 CA 15                                                        2
    Wise, P. J.
    {¶1}. Relator, David A. Joseph, Sr., has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus
    requesting this Court cause the charges against him in the Perry County Court to be
    dismissed and expunged. He argues he has not received a speedy trial, and the
    charge should be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
    {¶2}. For a writ of mandamus to issue, the relator must have a clear legal right
    to the relief prayed for, the respondent must be under a clear legal duty to perform the
    requested act, and relator must have no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary
    course of law. State, ex rel. Berger, v. McMonagle (1983), 
    6 Ohio St.3d 28
    , 6 OBR 50,
    
    451 N.E.2d 225
    .
    {¶3}. Relator is an inmate at the Ohio Department of Corrections. He has not
    filed an affidavit listing all prior civil actions as required by R.C. 2969.25 which
    provides,
    (A)    At the time that an inmate commences a civil action or appeal
    against a government entity or employee, the inmate shall file with the
    court an affidavit that contains a description of each civil action or appeal
    of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the previous five years in any
    state or federal court. The affidavit shall include all of the following for
    each of those civil actions or appeals:
    (1)    A brief description of the nature of the civil action or appeal;
    (2)    The case name, case number, and the court in which the civil
    action or appeal was brought;
    (3)    The name of each party to the civil action or appeal;
    Perry County, Case No. 14 CA 15                                                       3
    The outcome of the civil action or appeal, including whether the court
    dismissed the civil action or appeal as frivolous or malicious under state
    or federal law or rule of court, whether the court made an award against
    the inmate or the inmate's counsel of record for frivolous conduct under
    section 2323.51 of the Revised Code, another statute, or a rule of court,
    and, if the court so dismissed the action or appeal or made an award of
    that nature, the date of the final order affirming the dismissal or award.
    
    Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2969.25
    .
    {¶4}. “The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory and failure to comply
    with them requires dismissal of an inmate's complaint. State ex rel. Washington v. Ohio
    Adult Parole Auth., 
    87 Ohio St.3d 258
    , 259, 
    719 N.E.2d 544
     (1999), citing State ex rel.
    Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd., 
    82 Ohio St.3d 421
    , 422, 
    696 N.E.2d 594
     (1998). As held
    by the court of appeals, the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) must be filed at the
    time the complaint is filed, and an inmate may not cure the defect by later filings.
    Fuqua v. Williams, 
    100 Ohio St.3d 211
    , 
    2003-Ohio-5533
    , 
    797 N.E.2d 982
    , ¶ 9 (an
    inmate's “belated attempt to file the required affidavit does not excuse his
    noncompliance. See R.C. 2969.25(A), which requires that the affidavit be filed ‘[a]t the
    time that an inmate commences a civil action or appeal against a government entity or
    employee.’ [emphasis sic] ).” State ex rel. Hall v. Mohr, 
    2014-Ohio-3735
    .
    {¶5}. Because Relator did not file the required affidavit, we must dismiss the
    petition.
    Perry County, Case No. 14 CA 15                                                    4
    {¶6}. Even had we addressed the merits of the complaint, a claim for denial of
    speedy trial is not cognizable in an extraordinary-writ action. State ex rel. Barr v.
    Pittman, 
    2010-Ohio-4989
    , 
    127 Ohio St. 3d 32
    , 33, 
    936 N.E.2d 43
    .
    {¶7}. Based upon the foregoing, this cause is dismissed.
    By: Wise, P. J.
    Delaney, J., and
    Baldwin, J., concur.
    JWW/d 0929
    Perry County, Case No. 14 CA 15   5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14 CA 15

Citation Numbers: 2014 Ohio 4717

Judges: Wise

Filed Date: 10/23/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014