Amato v. Brady , 2022 Ohio 1723 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Amato v. Brady, 
    2022-Ohio-1723
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    LAKE COUNTY
    JAMES A. AMATO,                                 CASE NO. 2022-L-015
    TRUSTEE,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             Civil Appeal from the
    Court of Common Pleas
    -v-
    SPENCER BRADY,                                  Trial Court No. 2021 JL 003335
    Defendant-Appellant.
    MEMORANDUM
    OPINION
    Decided: May 23, 2022
    Judgment: Appeal dismissed
    David D. Briller, David D. Briller Co., L.P.A., 7379 Pearl Road, Suite 4, Middleburg
    Heights, OH 44130 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
    Spencer Brady, pro se, 802 East 305th Street, Willowick, OH 44095 (Defendant-
    Appellant).
    THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.
    {¶1}    On March 2, 2022, appellant, Spencer Brady, filed a pro se appeal from the
    Lake County Court of Common Pleas July 20, 2021 entry. Appellee, James A. Amato
    filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely. Appellant filed no opposition to the
    motion to dismiss.
    {¶2}    App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing
    a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has
    held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional
    defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F., 
    120 Ohio St.3d 499
    , 
    2008-Ohio-6810
    , ¶ 17,
    citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 
    40 Ohio St.3d 58
    , 60 (1988).
    {¶3}   “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal
    from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.
    3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of
    courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the
    judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the
    time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted in the appearance
    docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 
    163 Ohio App.3d 659
    , 664, 
    2005-Ohio-5360
    .
    {¶4}   Here, the trial court issued its entry on July 20, 2021. The clerk of courts
    noted on the appearance docket that notice of the entry under Civ.R. 58(B) was issued
    to the parties on that same date. Therefore, pursuant Civ.R. 58(B), the time to appeal
    began to run from July 20, 2021. The deadline for appellant to file his notice of appeal
    was August 19, 2021, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus, appellant’s March 2,
    2022 appeal was untimely filed by over six months.
    {¶5}   This court may not extend the time to appeal in civil cases. Pendell, supra
    at 60; see also App.R. 14(B).
    {¶6}   Based upon the foregoing, appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted.
    This appeal is dismissed pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).
    MATT LYNCH, J.,
    JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,
    concur.
    2
    Case No. 2022-L-015
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022-L-015

Citation Numbers: 2022 Ohio 1723

Judges: Wright

Filed Date: 5/23/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/23/2022