State v. Redic , 2019 Ohio 3395 ( 2019 )

[Cite as State v. Redic, 2019-Ohio-3395.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
GREENE COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO :
:
Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2019-CA-1
:
v. : Trial Court Case No. 2018-CR-320
:
JERAD D. REDIC : (Criminal Appeal from
: Common Pleas Court)
Defendant-Appellant :
:
...........
OPINION
Rendered on the 23rd day of August, 2019.
...........
DAVID M. MORRISON, Atty. Reg. No. 0087487, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Greene
County Prosecutor’s Office, 61 Greene Street, Suite 200, Xenia, Ohio 45385
Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee
HILARY LERMAN, Atty. Reg. No. 0029975, 249 Wyoming Street, Dayton, Ohio 45409
Attorney for Defendant-Appellant
.............
DONOVAN, J.
-2-
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Jerad D. Redic appeals his conviction for one count of
rape, in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), a felony of the first degree. Redic filed a timely
notice of appeal with this Court on January 4, 2019.
{¶ 2} The record establishes that Redic and the victim, Y.M., began dating in
October 2017. In May 2018, Redic was living with Y.M. at her residence in Fairborn,
Ohio. The incident which formed the basis of Redic’s conviction occurred on the night
of May 3-4, 2018. Y.M. testified that she and Redic had been arguing intermittently
throughout that day and into the evening. At some point, Y.M. began driving Redic in
her vehicle to a musical performance in Cincinnati, Ohio. During the drive, Y.M. and
Redic continued to argue, and she eventually turned her vehicle around and drove back
to her residence.
{¶ 3} Upon arriving back in Fairborn sometime after 10:00 p.m., Redic exited the
vehicle and entered Y.M.’s residence. Y.M. testified that she remained outside seated
in the vehicle for approximately ten to fifteen minutes. Y.M. testified that while she sat in
her vehicle, she observed Redic walking back and forth through the house. Y.M. further
testified that she could feel a “negative energy” coming from Redic as she observed him
pacing in the house. Eventually, Y.M. exited her vehicle and entered her residence.
Y.M. testified that as soon as she entered the house, Redic locked the door.
{¶ 4} Y.M. testified that, at this point, Redic began throwing things and kicking her
belongings around the inside of the residence. Y.M. testified that Redic then grabbed
her by her hair and neck, slammed her down on the floor, and dragged her to a nearby
couch, where he choked her until she briefly lost consciousness. Y.M. testified that while
-3-
he was choking her, Redic stated the she “had killed his baby” and that she had a “smart
mouth” that was “going to get her killed.”
{¶ 5} Redic then stood up and ordered Y.M. to remain on the couch. Y.M. testified
that she asked Redic to get her some water, but he told her to be quiet or he would hit
her in the face. Y.M. also testified that Redic said that she was going to “die that night.”
Y.M. testified that she remained lying on the couch for approximately 15 minutes because
she was scared to move. Eventually, Redic came and sat down beside Y.M. on the
couch and told her that she had to do what he told her to do. Y.M. testified that Redic
told her that she was his “hostage.” Redic also said that he would steal Y.M.’s social
security money, that he wanted to kill himself, and that he wanted to kill her.
{¶ 6} Y.M. testified that at this point, Redic removed his clothes, pulled Y.M. off of
the couch, and pulled down her pants. Y.M. testified that Redic first inserted his fingers
into her vagina, but stopped after she informed him that she was menstruating and was
using a tampon. Thereafter, Redic turned Y.M. around, forced her onto the sofa, spit
between her buttocks, and “very, very forcefully” inserted his penis into her anus. Y.M.
testified that although the two had engaged in consensual sex in the past, the sexual acts
which occurred between her and Redic on May 3 and 4, 2018, were not consensual.
{¶ 7} After the incident concluded, Y.M. and Redic went into the bathroom, after
which Redic took Y.M.’s cellphone and car keys and walked back into the living room.
Y.M. testified that she told Redic that she was in fear for her life and asked him if she
could use her cellphone to call her nephew. Redic gave Y.M. her cellphone back, and
Y.M. testified that she simultaneously received a call from her sister. Y.M. testified that
she told her sister to call back later. After Y.M. ended the call, however, she sent her
-4-
sister a text message directing her to call the police. Y.M. also provided her address and
Redic’s identifying information in the text message to her sister. Y.M. testified that she
did not mention that she had been raped in the text because she only wanted to include
pertinent information that would induce her sister to contact the police. Y.M. testified that
she could not call police herself because Redic was watching her, and she was scared of
how he would react. After Y.M. sent the text to her sister, Redic took her cellphone away
from her. Y.M. testified that Redic fell asleep on the couch shortly thereafter, and she
was able to regain possession of her cellphone.
{¶ 8} Y.M. testified that she later asked Redic if she could go outside and roll up
her vehicle’s windows in case it started raining. Redic kept her car keys but allowed Y.M.
to go outside under the pretense of rolling up her windows. Once outside, Y.M. called
911 and spoke to a dispatcher, explaining that she had been strangled, assaulted, and
held hostage in her own residence. Y.M. testified that the police officers arrived before
she had an opportunity to inform the dispatcher that she had been raped.
{¶ 9} Fairborn Police Officer Joshua Lightner testified that he and Officer Sopher
were the officers who responded to Y.M.’s residence. Officer Lightner testified that when
they arrived, Y.M. was standing in front of her residence waving them down. Officer
Lightner testified that Y.M. had visible injuries to her neck and was crying. Officer
Lightner further testified that he left Y.M. with Officer Sopher, while he (Lightner) went
inside the residence in order to locate Redic. We note that Officer Sopher did not testify
at trial.
{¶ 10} Officer Lightner testified that, after entering the residence, he found Redic
sleeping on the couch. Officer Lightner testified that Redic stated that he and Y.M. had
-5-
argued that night, but he denied that any type of physical altercation had occurred.
When Officer Lightner asked him how the argument ended, Redic stated that he “just
stopped talking to her and went to bed.” Officer Lightner testified that Redic claimed to
know nothing about the injuries to Y.M.’s neck. After further questioning from Officer
Lightner, Redic admitted that after they argued, he and Y.M. had “wrestled around.”
Redic then informed Officer Lightner that he and Y.M. had sex, and then he went to bed.
At this point, Officer Sopher called Officer Lightner back outside after Y.M. disclosed that
she had been raped. Officer Lightner testified that Redic’s hands were bleeding and he
had blood on his shirt. Thereafter, Redic was arrested and taken into custody while Y.M.
was taken to the hospital where a rape kit was performed and she was treated for her
injuries.
{¶ 11} On May 11, 2018, Redic was indicted for two counts of rape, in violation of
R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), both felonies of the first degree (Counts I and II); one count of
attempted felonious assault, in violation of R.C. 2923.02(A) and 2903.11(A)(1) (Count III);
and one count of abduction, in violation of R.C. 2905.02(A)(2), a felony of the third degree
(Count IV). At his arraignment on May 18, 2018, Redic stood mute, and the trial court
entered a plea of not guilty to the charged offenses.
{¶ 12} On June 12, 2018, the State filed a bill of particulars which described the
offenses as follows: Count I, rape, alleged forceful digital penetration of the vagina; Count
II, rape, alleged forceful penile penetration of the anus; Count III, attempted felonious
assault, alleged strangulation to the point of unconsciousness or near unconsciousness;
and Count IV, abduction, alleged that Redic restrained the liberty of Y.M. by force and
threat of force by locking the door to the residence, threatening physical harm, and
-6-
physically and sexually assaulting Y.M.
{¶ 13} The case proceeded to jury trial on November 5, 2018, after which Redic
was found guilty for Count II. Redic was acquitted on the remaining counts. At
disposition on December 14, 2018, the trial court sentenced Redic to a mandatory prison
term of seven years for Count II.1 Redic was also designated a Tier III sex offender.
{¶ 14} It is from this judgment that Redic now appeals.
{¶ 15} Redic’s sole assignment of error is as follows:
THE VERDICT WAS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE
EVIDENCE.
{¶ 16} In his assignment of error, Redic contends that the jury’s verdict finding him
guilty of rape was against the manifest weight of the evidence. Specifically, Redic
argues that because Y.M.’s medical history indicated a past history of schizoaffective
disorder, the jury lost its way in finding her testimony credible when she said that she did
not consent to anal intercourse with Redic. Redic also argues that additional evidence
was adduced at trial which clearly established that Y.M. was not telling the truth when she
claimed that she did not consent to anal intercourse with him.
{¶ 17} “The manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard of appellate review set forth
in State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 678 N.E.2d 541 (1997), applies in both criminal
and civil cases. Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328, 2012-Ohio-2179, 972 N.E.2d
517, ¶ 17-23.” Mathews v. Mathews, 2d Dist. Clark No. 2012-CA-79, 2013-Ohio-2471,
1 The trial court’s initial judgment entry of conviction erroneously stated that Redic had
been sentenced to a non-mandatory prison term of seven years. On January 25, 2019,
the trial court issued an amended judgment entry which correctly stated that Redic’s
seven-year sentence was mandatory.
-7-
¶ 9.
{¶ 18} This court has stated that “a weight of the evidence argument challenges
the believability of the evidence and asks which of the competing inferences suggested
by the evidence is more believable or persuasive.” (Citations omitted). State v. Jones, 2d
Dist. Montgomery No. 25724, 2014-Ohio-2309, ¶ 8. “When evaluating whether a
conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence, the appellate court must review
the entire record, weigh the evidence and all reasonable inferences, consider witness
credibility, and determine whether, in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the trier of fact
‘clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction
must be reversed and a new trial ordered.’ ” Id., quoting Thompkins at 387.
{¶ 19} Because the trier of fact sees and hears the witnesses at trial, we must
extend deference to the factfinder's decisions whether, and to what extent, to credit the
testimony of particular witnesses. State v. Lawson, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 16288, 1997
WL 476684, *4 (Aug. 22, 1997). However, we extend less deference in weighing
competing inferences suggested by the evidence. Id. The fact that the evidence is
subject to differing interpretations does not render the judgment against the manifest
weight of the evidence. State v. Wilson, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 22581, 2009-Ohio-525,
¶ 14. A judgment should be reversed as being against the manifest weight of the
evidence only in exceptional circumstances. State v. Martin, 20 Ohio App.3d 172, 175,
485 N.E.2d 717 (1st Dist.1983).
{¶ 20} At trial, Y.M. testified to past instances of drinking alcohol and smoking
marijuana, but she testified consistently throughout the trial that she was sober on the
night of the incident. Y.M. also testified that she did not have any concerns regarding
-8-
her mental health, though she admitted to being diagnosed as a child with bipolar
disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety. Although the records were
never admitted into evidence, Redic was permitted to question Y.M. regarding old medical
records from Eastway Behavioral Health which indicated that Y.M. had in fact been
diagnosed with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and PTSD. Redic also presented
medical records from a hospital visit in August 2018, which indicated that Y.M. had been
diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder.
{¶ 21} Y.M., however, testified that she had never suffered from hallucinations, and
did not take any medications to treat her diagnoses. Y.M. also testified that she was
never informed that she had been diagnosed with schizophrenia and had never been
treated for that condition. Nevertheless, Y.M. maintained that she was sexually
assaulted by Redic and that she had not hallucinated the assault or the injuries she
suffered as a result of the assault.
{¶ 22} At trial, Redic presented the testimony of Dr. Julie Walsh-Messinger, a
clinical psychologist employed by the University of Dayton and an expert on
schizophrenia and related disorders. Significantly, Messinger testified that she had
never treated or even met Y.M. Messinger testified that schizophrenia is a chronic
disorder marked by symptoms such as hallucinations, lack of affect, social withdrawal,
and unclear thought processes. Messinger further testified that schizoaffective disorder
includes schizophrenia coupled with episodes of depression or mania. Messinger
testified that those individuals suffering from the disorder may exhibit fixed, but false,
beliefs. Messinger testified that the disorder can also affect memory and may result in
“circumstantial or tangential speech,” which she described as becoming easily distracted
-9-
when speaking with others while constantly shifting the focus of the conversation.
Nevertheless, Messinger testified that a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder does not
mean that a particular individual is incapable of accurately recalling past events and
relaying them to others. Additionally, Messinger testified that memories of being
physically assaulted are much less likely to be affected by schizoaffective disorder
because of the manner in which the brain stores the memory.
{¶ 23} On cross-examination, Y.M. acknowledged having made a Facebook Live
video on May 4, 2018 upon returning from the hospital after the incident. In the video,
Y.M. stated that she was drunk at the hospital. Y.M. also stated in the video that “you
can’t rape the willing” and that if Redic wanted to have sex, “all he had to do was ask.”
The video further depicted Y.M. in possession of some type of herb that she stated was
used as a “natural remedy.”
{¶ 24} Despite the statements made by her in the video, Y.M. testified that she did
not have any alcohol to drink that night and was not drunk at the hospital. Rather, Y.M.
testified that the statements she made in the video were merely a “figure of speech.”
Y.M. also testified that “[she] can say anything [she] want[s] for social media.” On re-
direct, Y.M. testified that she was neither drunk, high, nor hallucinating on the night that
the incident occurred. Y.M. testified that she did not know what “schizoaffective disorder,
bipolar type” was, and she had never received any type of treatment for that disorder.
With respect to her statement “you can’t rape the willing,” Y.M. testified that she often
attempted in the past to initiate sex with Redic, but he was rarely interested. Y.M.
testified that if Redic had wanted to have consensual sex, she would have agreed. When
she was asked whether she consented to sex with Redic on May 3 and 4, 2018, she
-10-
testified that she did not consent.
{¶ 25} The State also presented the testimony of Kathleen Hackett, a sexual
assault nurse from SANE (Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners) of Butler County, Ohio.
Hackett testified that she performed a sexual assault examination of Y.M. on May 4, 2018.
Hackett testified that Y.M. presented with visible injuries including swelling to her left
cheek, as well as scratches and abrasions on the right side of her neck. Hackett also
testified that Y.M. had a hematoma or swelling on her forehead and bruising on her right
wrist. Hackett testified that Y.M. suffered an injury to her anus called an anal prolapse,
which is where “[t]he folds of the anus are prolapsed outside the anus” and “that’s usually
seen with forceful penetration.” Tr. 219. Hackett further testified that an anal prolapse
has occurred “when the inner folds are pulled out of the anus * * * the sphincter muscle
* * * in the case half of it was pulled out. * * * It was just solid and swollen red. * * * It’s
outside – outside the body – or outside where it should be.” Tr. 220.
{¶ 26} With respect to Y.M.’s demeanor during the examination and interview,
Hackett testified that Y.M. was able to understand the questions being asked of her, was
coherent and oriented, and exhibited no indications that she was providing inaccurate
information regarding the incident. Hackett also testified that Y.M. did not appear to be
suffering from hallucinations. Y.M. did not inform Hackett that any vaginal penetration
had occurred, but Y.M. did indicate that Redic had anally penetrated her with his penis
and that he did ejaculate. Therefore, Hackett swabbed for potential semen. Y.M. stated
to Hackett that Redic sustained a scratch to his right hand during the incident. Finally,
Hackett testified that she observed evidence that Y.M. had been strangled, namely: hair
pulling, scratch marks, and fingernail impressions on her neck. As previously stated,
-11-
Officer Lightner observed that Redic was bleeding from cuts on his hands when initial
contact was made at Y.M.’s residence on the night of the incident.
{¶ 27} The State presented the testimony of Hallie Dreyer, a forensic scientist with
the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation. Dreyer conducted a DNA analysis of the
swabs taken by Hackett for Y.M.’s rape kit. Dreyer testified that based upon the DNA
found on the anal swabs and a swab of Y.M.’s right buttock, Redic could not be excluded
as a contributor to the male DNA found on the swabs. Additionally, Dreyer testified that
there was no foreign DNA from any other males on the samples taken by Hackett.
{¶ 28} Thus, having reviewed the record, we find no merit in Redic's manifest
weight challenge. It is well settled that evaluating witness credibility is primarily for the
trier of fact. State v. Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 27571, 2018-Ohio-3294; see also
State v. Benton, 2d Dist. Miami No. 2010-CA-27, 2012-Ohio-4080, ¶ 7. A trier of fact
does not lose its way and create a manifest miscarriage of justice if its resolution of
conflicting testimony is reasonable. Id. Here, the jury reasonably credited the State's
evidence, specifically the testimony of Y.M., which established that Redic was guilty of
the offense of which he was convicted. Furthermore, the fact that the jury acquitted
Redic on Counts I, III, and IV supports our conclusion that the jury was able to carefully
weigh the evidence. See State v. Embry, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 19096, 2002 WL
1483232, *3. Accordingly, the jury did not lose its way and create a manifest miscarriage
of justice in reaching a guilty verdict for rape.
{¶ 29} Redic’s assignment of error is overruled.
{¶ 30} Redic’s sole assignment of error having been overruled, the judgment of the
trial court is affirmed.
-12-
.............
WELBAUM, P.J. and FROELICH, J., concur.
Copies sent to:
David M. Morrison
Hilary Lerman
Hon. James A. Brogan, Visiting Judge