In re O.B. , 2022 Ohio 2914 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as In re O.B., 
    2022-Ohio-2914
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    WARREN COUNTY
    IN RE:                                            :
    O.B., et al.                             :      CASE NOS. CA2022-04-019
    CA2022-04-021
    :                CA2022-04-022
    :              DECISION
    8/22/2022
    :
    :
    APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    JUVENILE DIVISION
    Case Nos. 21-D000060; 21-D000061; 21-D000062
    Tibbs Law Office, LLC, and Sarah E. Michel, for appellant.
    Ostrowski Law Firm, Co., L.P.A., and Andrea G. Ostrowski, for Mother.
    Aaron Aldridge, for custodians.
    Andrew J. Brenner, guardian ad litem.
    David Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michelle Belknap, Assistant
    Prosecuting Attorney, for Warren County Children Services.
    Per Curiam.
    {¶1}     This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
    appellant, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and
    Warren CA2022-04-019
    CA2022-04-021
    CA2022-04-022
    original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and
    upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
    {¶2}    Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S.Ct. 1396
     (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of
    the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court
    prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;
    (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 
    87 S.Ct. at 1400
    ; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine
    whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of
    appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for
    appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both
    the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
    {¶3}    Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
    been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
    appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
    requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason
    that it is wholly frivolous.
    M. POWELL, P.J., S. POWELL and BYRNE, JJ., concur.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2022-04-019 CA2022-04-021 CA2022-04-022

Citation Numbers: 2022 Ohio 2914

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 8/22/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/22/2022