Perkins v. Perkins , 2022 Ohio 3116 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Perkins v. Perkins, 
    2022-Ohio-3116
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    GEAUGA COUNTY
    JAMES R. PERKINS,                                CASE NO. 2022-G-0029
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    Civil Appeal from the
    - vs -                                   Court of Common Pleas
    STACY L. PERKINS,
    Trial Court No. 2021 DC 000157
    Defendant-Appellee.
    MEMORANDUM
    OPINION
    Decided: September 6, 2022
    Judgment: Appeal dismissed
    J. Michael Drain, Jr., 147 Bell Street, Suite 202, Chagrin Falls, OH 44022 (For Plaintiff-
    Appellant).
    Gregory S. Costabile, 1400 Fifth Third Center, 600 Superior Avenue, East, Cleveland,
    OH 44114 (For Defendant-Appellee).
    MATT LYNCH, J.
    {¶1}     Appellant, James R. Perkins, through counsel, appeals a July 18, 2022
    order, in which a magistrate from the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas granted
    the motion in limine filed by appellee, Stacy L. Perkins.
    {¶2}     Initially, we must determine whether there is a final appealable order since
    this court may entertain only those appeals from final judgments or orders. Noble v.
    Colwell, 
    44 Ohio St.3d 92
    , 94 (1989). Under Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio
    Constitution, a judgment of a trial court can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court
    only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2003-
    L-116, 
    2003-Ohio-6241
    , ¶ 3. If a lower court’s order is not final, then an appellate court
    does not have jurisdiction to review the matter, and the matter must be dismissed. Gen.
    Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 
    44 Ohio St.3d 17
    , 20 (1989).
    {¶3}   R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth seven categories of
    appealable judgment, and if the judgment of the trial court satisfies any of them, it will be
    deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed. Here, the July
    18, 2022 order on appeal does not fit within any of the categories for being a final order
    pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B) and did not dispose of all the claims.
    {¶4}   Generally, a trial court’s decision to grant a motion in limine is an
    interlocutory order that is not final and appealable. Gable v. Gates Mills, 
    103 Ohio St.3d 449
    , 
    2004-Ohio-5719
    , ¶ 34. Furthermore, “* * * a magistrate may enter orders without
    judicial approval if necessary to regulate the proceedings and if not dispositive of a claim
    or defense of a party.” See Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(a)(i). This court has held that “[a]lthough
    magistrate’s orders are effective without judicial approval, they are not directly
    appealable.” Arnold v. Arnold, 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2021-G-0026, 
    2021-Ohio-4186
    , ¶
    6. Hence, a magistrate’s order is simply interlocutory by nature. 
    Id.
    {¶5}   In this matter, the July 18, 2022 magistrate’s order is not a final appealable
    order, and this court does not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal.           The order is
    interlocutory. Nothing is preventing appellant from obtaining effective relief through an
    appeal once the trial court has entered a final judgment in the action.
    2
    Case No. 2022-G-0029
    {¶6}     Based upon the foregoing analysis, the order of the trial court is not a final
    appealable order. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of
    jurisdiction.
    {¶7}     Appeal dismissed.
    CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,
    MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,
    concur.
    3
    Case No. 2022-G-0029
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022-G-0029

Citation Numbers: 2022 Ohio 3116

Judges: Lynch

Filed Date: 9/6/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/6/2022