Gray v. Clipper , 2020 Ohio 318 ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Gray v. Clipper, 2020-Ohio-318.]
    STATE OF OHIO                     )                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    )ss:             NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF LORAIN                  )
    JOSEPH GRAY
    C.A. No.     19CA011596
    Petitioner
    v.
    ORIGINAL ACTION IN
    KIMBERLY CLIPPER, WARDEN                           HABEAS CORPUS
    Respondent
    Dated: February 3, 2020
    PER CURIAM.
    {¶1}     Joseph Gray has petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus to order
    Respondent, Warden Kimberly Clipper, to release him from custody. Because Mr. Gray has
    not complied with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this Court must dismiss
    this case.
    {¶2}     R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a
    civil action against a government employee or entity. Respondent Clipper, Warden of the
    Lorain Correctional Institution, is a government employee; Mr. Gray, incarcerated in the
    Lorain Correctional Institution, is an inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and (D). A case must be
    dismissed if the inmate fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25
    in the commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 
    106 Ohio St. 3d 63
    , 2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory,
    and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”).
    C.A. No. 19CA011596
    Page 2 of 2
    {¶3}    Mr. Gray did not pay the cost deposit required by this Court’s Local Rules.
    He also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C), which sets forth specific requirements for
    an inmate who seeks to proceed without paying the cost deposit. Mr. Gray did not file an
    affidavit of indigency and he did not file a statement of his prisoner trust account that sets
    forth the balance in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as certified
    by the institutional cashier. Mr. Gray also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) which
    requires the filing of an affidavit of prior civil actions including specific, mandatory,
    information.
    {¶4}    Because Mr. Gray did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C.
    2969.25, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Mr. Gray.
    {¶5}    The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default
    notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58.
    THOMAS A. TEODOSIO
    FOR THE COURT
    CARR, J.
    HENSAL, J.
    CONCUR.
    APPEARANCES:
    JOSEPH GRAY, Pro se, Petitioner.
    DAVE YOST, Attorney General, and DANIEL J. BENOIT, Associate Assistant Attorney
    General, for Respondent.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19CA011596

Citation Numbers: 2020 Ohio 318

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 2/3/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/3/2020