State v. Connaughton , 2020 Ohio 417 ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Connaughton, 2020-Ohio-417.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    BUTLER COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                   :
    Appellee,                                 :      CASE NO. CA2019-07-120
    :            DECISION
    - vs -                                                     2/10/2020
    :
    BRIAN CONNAUGHTON,                               :
    Appellant.                                :
    CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    Case No. CRI2019-05-0686
    Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government
    Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for appellee
    Christopher Paul Frederick, 300 High Street, Suite 550, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellant
    Per Curiam.
    {¶1}    This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
    appellant, Brian Connaughton, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript
    of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and
    upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
    {¶2}    Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of
    the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court
    Butler CA2019-07-120
    prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;
    (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 
    744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400
    ; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine
    whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of
    appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for
    appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both
    the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
    {¶3}    Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
    been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
    appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
    requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason
    that it is wholly frivolous.
    HENDRICKSON, P.J., S. POWELL and RINGLAND, JJ., concur.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2019-07-120

Citation Numbers: 2020 Ohio 417

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 2/10/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/10/2020