In re G.P. , 2015 Ohio 4091 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as In re G.P., 
    2015-Ohio-4091
    .]
    COURT OF APPEALS
    RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO
    FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    IN THE MATTER OF:                            :       JUDGES:
    :       Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J.
    G.P.                                         :       Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.
    :       Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J.
    DELINQUENT CHILD                             :
    :
    :       Case No. 15-CA-23
    :
    :       OPINION
    CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING:                             Appeal from the Court of Common
    Pleas, Juvenile Division, Case No.
    2014-DEL-00730
    JUDGMENT:                                            Affirmed
    DATE OF JUDGMENT:                                    September 30, 2015
    APPEARANCES:
    For Plaintiff-Appellant                              For Defendant-Appellee
    LILLIAN R. SHUN                                      JOHN S. DILTS
    38 South Park Street                                 28 South Park Street
    Mansfield, OH 44902                                  Mansfield, OH 44902
    Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23                                                     2
    Farmer, J.
    {¶1}   The Huron County Juvenile Court adjudicated appellee, G.P., delinquent
    for having committed one count of gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05.
    On December 1, 2014, finding that appellee was residing with his maternal
    grandparents in Richland County, the Huron County court transferred the case to the
    Richland County Juvenile Court for final disposition.
    {¶2}   A status conference was held on January 14, 2015 during which
    appellee's parents acknowledged they were the minor's legal custodians and they
    resided in Huron County, but appellee was residing with his maternal grandparents in
    Richland County.
    {¶3}   A dispositional hearing was held on March 3, 2015. By judgment entry
    filed same date, the trial court accepted the transfer from the Huron County Juvenile
    Court, and committed appellee to the Ohio Department of Youth Services for an
    indeterminate period of six months to age 21, suspended in lieu of community control
    until age 21. Also on March 3, 2015, the trial court filed a supplemental judgment entry,
    placing appellee in the temporary custody of his maternal grandmother who resided in
    Richland County.
    {¶4}   Appellant, the state of Ohio, filed an appeal and this matter is now before
    this court for consideration. Assignment of error is as follows:
    I
    {¶5}   "THE COURT COMMITTED ERROR WHEN IT ACCEPTED TRANSFER
    OF G.P.'S CASE BECAUSE A JUVENILE CASE MAY ONLY BE TRANSFERRED TO
    THE COUNTY OF THE CHILD'S RESIDENCE."
    Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23                                                       3
    I
    {¶6}   Appellant claims the trial court lacked jurisdiction to determine disposition
    because appellee's parents are the minor's legal custodians and they reside in Huron
    County and pursuant to R.C. 2151.06, a minor's residence is presumed to be the
    residence of his/her parents. We disagree that the trial court lacked jurisdiction.
    {¶7}   Juv.R. 11 governs transfer to another county. Subsection (A) states the
    following:
    If the child resides in a county of this state and the proceeding is
    commenced in a court of another county, that court, on its own motion or a
    motion of a party, may transfer the proceeding to the county of the child's
    residence upon the filing of the complaint or after the adjudicatory or
    dispositional hearing for such further proceeding as required. The court of
    the child's residence shall then proceed as if the original complaint had
    been filed in that court. Transfer may also be made if the residence of the
    child changes.
    {¶8}   After finding appellee delinquent for having committed one count of gross
    sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05, the Huron County Juvenile Court
    transferred the case to Richland County, finding the following in its judgment filed
    December 1, 2014:
    Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23                                                     4
    Thereupon, the Court found that the minor child herein, [G.P.], is in
    the custody of maternal grandparents, Mr. and Mrs. Robson, and they
    reside at 1410 Paradise View Street, Mansfield, Ohio 44905.
    It appearing that the child in this case has a legal settlement in the
    County of Richland, State of Ohio; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and
    decreed that jurisdiction over said child be transferred to Richland County
    Juvenile Court.
    {¶9}   In its judgment entry filed March 3, 2015, the trial court accepted the
    transfer and proceeded to disposition, ordering the following in part:
    The Court places the minor child, [G.P.], in the temporary custody
    of his grandmother, Kimberly Brown-Robson.         Address: 1410 Paradise
    View Street, Mansfield, Ohio 44905.         Phone: 419-631-6838.       DOB:
    08/21/1960. SSN:XXX-XX-6874. Referral is made to CSEA for support
    determination.
    {¶10} The trial court made this same order in a supplemental judgment entry
    also filed on March 3, 2015.
    {¶11} A pre-disposition report for sex offender assessment was filed on
    February 20, 2015 prior to the dispositional hearing and included the following under
    "Child and Family History":
    Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23                                                      5
    [G.P.] is 14 year old male who is currently residing with his
    maternal grandmother and step-grandfather, Kimberly and Scott Robson.
    He went to live there in August '14 through grandparent power of attorney
    as a result of this offense.***The original plan is to allow [G.] to stay there
    one year through August '15. He sees his parents usually every weekend,
    either at his grandparents or occasionally at his own home if his sisters
    are gone.
    {¶12} During the status conference held on January 14, 2015, the following
    discussion was held (T. at 7-9):
    THE COURT: Now, um as to both of you, Richard and Elizabeth,
    are you together? So you are married, you are together?
    ELIZABETH [P.] [MOTHER]: Yes.
    THE COURT: And are you the legal custodian of [G.]?
    ELIZABETH [P.]: We have custody.            My mom has Power of
    Attorney. He currently resides with my mother.
    THE COURT: Okay. So, so of course you folks are the uh parents.
    So by law you're, you're biological parents?
    ELIZABETH [P.]: Uh huh.
    THE COURT: So by law you are the legal custodian. So what is it,
    a grandparent affidavit? How do you have, how do you function? By what
    authority do you function? It was mentioned Power of - -.
    Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23                                                     6
    KIMBERLY ROBSON [GRANDMOTHER]: Power of Attorney.
    Yeah, we came up here to get it so he could go to school, or I could take
    him to the doctor.
    THE COURT: Do you have a copy of that?
    KIMBERLY ROBSON: Uh huh. Yes I do.
    THE COURT: I would like to see that. Because uh, Richard and
    Elizabeth, you live in - -?
    ELIZABETH [P.]: Willard.
    THE COURT: Willard, Huron County.
    ELIZABETH [P.]: Uh huh.
    THE COURT: But the grandparents here, um - -.
    ELIZABETH [P.]: Live in Richland.
    ***
    THE COURT: Mansfield.        So parents have uh legal custody by
    operation of law. And it looks like, do you have other little children in your
    home?
    ***
    THE COURT: Well I mean, is that why you had the transfer, - -
    RICHARD [P.]: Yes.
    ELIZABETH [P.]: Yes.
    THE COURT: - - to sort of get him away from those kids?
    ELIZABETH [P.]: Yes.
    THE COURT: And how long have you had [G.]?
    Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23                                                  7
    KIMBERLY ROBSON: I have had him since the incident in August.
    THE COURT: This August. And is it your hope and desire, all of
    you, that he will remain with you for the foreseeable future? Or what is,
    what is the - -?
    ELIZABETH [P.]: When he finishes counseling and gets the green
    light to come home our hope is that he is going to come home.
    THE COURT: Do you have any idea when that may be?
    ELIZABETH [P.]: Uh counseling is at least an eighteen month
    program.
    {¶13} Upon review, we find the trial court did not err in accepting jurisdiction
    given the undisputed facts in the record.
    {¶14} The sole assignment of error is denied.
    Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23                                             8
    {¶15} The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Richland County, Ohio is
    hereby affirmed.
    By, Farmer, J.
    Gwin, P.J. and
    Hoffman, J. concur.
    SGF/sg 925
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-CA-23

Citation Numbers: 2015 Ohio 4091

Judges: Farmer

Filed Date: 9/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021