State v. Gopar , 2022 Ohio 695 ( 2022 )

[Cite as State v. Gopar, 2022-Ohio-695.]
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
STATE OF OHIO, :
Plaintiff-Appellee, :
No. 110648
v. :
MARIO GOPAR, :
Defendant-Appellant. :
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED
RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 10, 2022
Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
Case No. CR-20-651803-A
Appearances:
Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
Attorney, and Glen Ramdhan, Assistant Prosecuting
Attorney, for appellee.
Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and
Robert B. McCaleb, Assistant Public Defender, for
appellant.
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J.:
Defendant-appellant Mario Gopar brings this appeal challenging his
indefinite sentence with a minimum prison term of five years and a maximum
prison term of seven and one-half years for sexual battery and gross sexual
imposition. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in imposing an indefinite
prison sentence because the Reagan Tokes Law is unconstitutional. After a
thorough review of the record and law, this court affirms.
I. Factual and Procedural History
The instant appeal arose from several sexual offenses appellant
committed against victim M.G. (d.o.b. December 22, 2009) between January 2017
and July 2020. Appellant was ultimately arrested on July 18, 2020.
On July 28, 2020, a Cuyahoga County Grand Jury returned a 17-count
indictment charging appellant with ten counts of rape, first-degree felonies in
violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) (Counts 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, and 14), and
seven counts of gross sexual imposition, third-degree felonies in violation of R.C.
2907.05(A)(4) (Counts 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 16, and 17). The rape offenses contained a
furthermore clause alleging that appellant “purposely compelled the victim, who
was under thirteen years of age but ten years of age or older at the time of the
commission of the offense * * * to submit by force or threat of force.” Appellant pled
not guilty to the indictment during his July 31, 2020 arraignment.
The parties reached a plea agreement during pretrial proceedings. On
June 15, 2021, appellant pled guilty to amended Counts 2 and 14, sexual battery,
second-degree felonies in violation of R.C. 2907.03(A)(5), and three counts of gross
sexual imposition, third-degree felonies in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4) (Counts
3, 15, and 17). The remaining counts were nolled. The trial court proceeded
immediately to sentencing.
The trial court advised appellant that the Reagan Tokes Law applied to
Count 14.1 The trial court imposed an aggregate indefinite prison sentence with a
minimum prison term of five years and a maximum prison term of seven and one-
half years. The trial court issued a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry on August 9, 2021,
to accurately reflect that the sexual battery offenses on Counts 2 and 14 were second-
degree felonies.
Appellant filed the instant appeal on July 12, 2021, challenging the trial
court’s sentence. Appellant assigns one error for review:
I. The trial court violated [appellant’s] constitutional rights by
imposing a Reagan Tokes Sentence, under S.B. 201.
II. Law and Analysis
In his sole assignment of error, appellant argues that the Reagan Tokes
Law is unconstitutional. Appellant contends that this court should adopt and apply
the holdings from State v. Delvallie, 2021-Ohio-1809, 173 N.E.3d 544 (8th Dist.),
State v. Seeley, 2021-Ohio-1949, 173 N.E.3d 894 (8th Dist.), and State v. Daniel,
2021-Ohio-1963, 173 N.E.3d 184 (8th Dist.).
This court has recently conducted en banc review of the
constitutionality of the Reagan Tokes Act. See State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga
No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470. In Delvallie, this court overruled the challenges
1 The Reagan Tokes Law became effective on March 22, 2019. The offense date
charged in Count 14 was “[o]n or about December 22, 2019 to March 21, 2020.” The
offense date charged in Count 2, however, was “[o]n or about January 1, 2017 to
December 31, 2017.” Accordingly, appellant committed the offense charged in Count 2
prior to the effective date of Reagan Tokes.
presented in this appeal to the constitutionality of the Reagan Tokes Act (enacted
through S.B. 201), and vacated Delvallie, 2021-Ohio-1809, 173 N.E.3d 544, Seeley,
and Daniels.
Pursuant to Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470,
appellant’s sole assignment of error is overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the
common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27
of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE
LISA B. FORBES, J., and
MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR
N.B. Judge Lisa B. Forbes is constrained to apply Delvallie. For a full explanation,
see State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470 (Forbes, J.,
dissenting).