State v. Perry , 2022 Ohio 944 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Perry, 
    2022-Ohio-944
    .]
    COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    STATE OF OHIO,                                   :
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             :
    No. 110414
    v.                              :
    DEONTRA PERRY,                                   :
    Defendant-Appellant.            :
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED
    RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 24, 2022
    Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
    Case No. CR-20-651752-A
    Appearances:
    Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
    Attorney, and Alicia Harrison, Assistant Prosecuting
    Attorney, for appellee.
    Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and
    Paul A. Kuzmins, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
    LISA B. FORBES, J.:
    I.    Facts and Procedural History
    On March 2, 2021, Deontra Perry (“Perry”) pled guilty to felonious
    assault, a felony of the second degree in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(2) with a one-
    year firearm specification; discharge of a firearm on or near prohibited premises, a
    felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2923.162(A)(3); and having weapons
    while under disability, a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2).
    On the same day, the trial court sentenced Perry to one year in prison
    for the firearm specification, four to six years in prison, under the Reagan Tokes
    Law, for the felonious assault, 36 months in prison for the discharge of a firearm on
    or near a prohibited premises, and 36 months in prison for the having weapons
    while under disability. The one-year prison term for the firearm specification was
    ordered to be served prior to and consecutively to all other charges, which were
    ordered to be served concurrently.
    It is from this sentence that Perry appeals, arguing that the Reagan
    Tokes Law is unconstitutional because it violates the right to trial by jury, the
    separation-of-powers doctrine, and the right to due process.
    II. Conclusion
    Perry’s assignment of error is overruled pursuant to this court’s en
    banc decision in State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 
    2022-Ohio-470
    .
    Judgment affirmed.
    It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
    The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
    It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the
    common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.
    A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27
    of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    LISA B. FORBES, JUDGE
    ANITA LASTER MAYS, P.J., and
    EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
    N.B. The author of this opinion is constrained to apply Delvallie. For a full
    explanation, see State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 
    2022-Ohio-470
    (Forbes, J., dissenting).
    Judge Eileen T. Gallagher joined the dissent by Judge Lisa B. Forbes in Delvallie
    and would have found that R.C. 2967.271(C) and (D) of the Reagan Tokes Law are
    unconstitutional.
    Judge Anita Laster Mays is constrained to apply Delvallie’s en banc decision. For
    a full explanation of her analysis, see State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga
    No. 109315, 
    2022-Ohio-470
     (Laster Mays, P.J., concurring in part and dissenting
    in part).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 110414

Citation Numbers: 2022 Ohio 944

Filed Date: 3/24/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/24/2022