State v. Ligon , 2023 Ohio 1751 ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Ligon, 
    2023-Ohio-1751
    .]
    COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    STATE OF OHIO,                                    :
    Plaintiff-Appellee,              :
    No. 112034
    v.                               :
    ERIS LIGON,                                       :
    Defendant-Appellant.             :
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED
    RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: May 25, 2023
    Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
    Case Nos. CR-20-654228-A, CR-20-654230-A, and CR-21-660714-A
    Appearances:
    Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
    Attorney, and Margaret Graham, Assistant Prosecuting
    Attorney, for appellee.
    Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and
    Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for
    appellant.
    LISA B. FORBES, J.:
    Appellant Eris Ligon (“Ligon”) appeals the trial court’s journal entry
    sentencing him to an indefinite prison term pursuant to the Reagan Tokes Law.
    After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we affirm.
    I.   Facts and Procedural History
    Ligon pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, a first-degree felony in
    violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1) with a one-year firearm specification; grand theft, a
    fourth-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(1); theft, a first-degree
    misdemeanor in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(1); and carrying concealed weapons, a
    fourth-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2923.12(A)(2).
    In a September 16, 2022 journal entry, the trial court sentenced Ligon
    to an aggregate prison term of 4-5.5 years. It is from this order that Ligon appeals.
    II. Law and Analysis
    In his sole assignment of error, Ligon claims that “the trial court erred
    when it imposed an S.B. 201 indeterminate sentence over objections to its
    constitutionality.” On appeal, Ligon concedes that his appellate “arguments are
    inconsistent with the en banc decision in Delvallie”; however, he is appealing to
    preserve the issue pending the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Hacker,
    
    2020-Ohio-5048
    , 
    161 N.E.3d 112
     (3d Dist.), and State v. Simmons, 
    2021-Ohio-939
    ,
    
    169 N.E.3d 728
     (8th Dist.).
    Ligon’s assignment of error is overruled pursuant to this court’s en
    banc decision in State v. Delvallie, 
    2022-Ohio-470
    , 
    185 N.E.3d 536
     (8th Dist.).
    Judgment affirmed.
    It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
    The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
    It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the
    common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.          The defendant’s
    conviction having been affirmed, any bail pending appeal is terminated. Case
    remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence.
    A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27
    of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    _______________________________
    LISA B. FORBES, JUDGE
    FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, P.J., and
    EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
    N.B. The author of this opinion is constrained to apply Delvallie. For a full
    explanation, see State v. Delvallie, 
    2022-Ohio-470
    , 
    185 N.E.3d 536
     (8th Dist.)
    (Forbes, J., dissenting).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 112034

Citation Numbers: 2023 Ohio 1751

Judges: Forbes

Filed Date: 5/25/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/25/2023