McLean v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. , 2010 Ohio 4231 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as McLean v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 
    2010-Ohio-4231
    .]
    Court of Claims of Ohio
    The Ohio Judicial Center
    65 South Front Street, Third Floor
    Columbus, OH 43215
    614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
    www.cco.state.oh.us
    ADAM MCLEAN
    Plaintiff
    v.
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    Defendant
    Case No. 2010-03185-AD
    Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    FINDINGS OF FACT
    {¶ 1} 1)      Plaintiff, Adam McLean, filed a complaint against defendant,
    Department of Transportation (ODOT), alleging that his automobile was damaged as a
    proximate cause of negligence on the part of ODOT in maintaining a hazardous
    condition on Interstate 75 at the approach to the Brent Spence Bridge spanning the
    Ohio River between Kentucky and Ohio. Plaintiff related “[w]hen driving through Ohio I
    hit something right before the bridge on 75 North.” Plaintiff pointed out his vehicle
    struck “a pothole on the bridge itself.”              Plaintiff recalled the incident occurred on
    December 23, 2009 at approximately 8:00 p.m. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount
    of $554.46, the cost of replacement parts and related repair expenses.                          Plaintiff
    submitted the $25.00 filing fee and requested reimbursement of that cost along with his
    damage claim.
    {¶ 2} 2)      Defendant filed an investigation report requesting plaintiff’s claim be
    dismissed due to the fact that the Commonwealth of Kentucky and not ODOT bears the
    maintenance responsibility for the substantial portion of Interstate 75 on the Brent
    Spence Bridge. Defendant submitted photographs depicting the Brent Spence Bridge
    advising that practically the entire bridge deck is located within the Commonwealth of
    Kentucky and is consequently the maintenance responsibility of that governmental
    entity.    Defendant stated “[a]s such, the State of Kentucky is the proper party to
    plaintiff’s claim, not the defendant.”        The site of the damage-causing incident was
    located within the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
    {¶ 3} 1)     R.C. 2743.01(A) provides:
    {¶ 4} “(A) ‘State’ means the state of Ohio, including, but not limited to, the
    general assembly, the supreme court, the offices of all elected state officers, and all
    departments,         boards,   offices,   commissions,   agencies,    institutions,   and   other
    instrumentalities of the state. ‘State’ does not include political subdivisions.”
    {¶ 5} 2)     R.C. 2743.02(A)(1) states in pertinent part:
    {¶ 6} “(A)(1) The state hereby waives its immunity from liability, except as
    provided for the office of the state fire marshal in division (G)(1) of section 9.60 and
    division (B) of section 3737.221 of the Revised Code and subject to division (H) of this
    section, and consents to be sued, and have its liability determined, in the court of claims
    created in this chapter in accordance with the same rules of law applicable to suits
    between private parties, except that the determination of liability is subject to the
    limitations set forth in this chapter and, in the case of state universities or colleges, in
    section 3345.40 of the Revised Code, and except as provided in division (A)(2) or (3) of
    this section. to the extent that the state has previously consented to be sued, this
    chapter has no applicability.”
    {¶ 7} 3)     R.C. 5501.31 in pertinent part states:
    {¶ 8} “Except in the case of maintaining, repairing, erecting traffic signs on, or
    pavement marking of state highways within villages, which is mandatory as required by
    section 5521.01 of the Revised Code, and except as provided in section 5501.49 of the
    Revised Code, no duty of constructing, reconstructing, widening, resurfacing,
    maintaining, or repairing state highways within municipal corporations, or the bridges
    and culverts thereon, shall attach to or rest upon the director . . .”
    {¶ 9}   The site of the damage-causing incident was not the maintenance
    jurisdiction of defendant. Consequently, plaintiff’s case is dismissed.
    Court of Claims of Ohio
    The Ohio Judicial Center
    65 South Front Street, Third Floor
    Columbus, OH 43215
    614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
    www.cco.state.oh.us
    ADAM MCLEAN
    Plaintiff
    v.
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    Defendant
    Case No. 2010-03185-AD
    Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert
    ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION
    Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth
    above, plaintiff’s claim is DISMISSED. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff
    .
    ________________________________
    DANIEL R. BORCHERT
    Deputy Clerk
    Entry cc:
    Adam McLean                                        Jolene M. Molitoris, Director
    4177 Watertrace Drive                              Department of Transportation
    Lexington, Kentucky 40515                          1980 West Broad Street
    Columbus, Ohio 43223
    RDK/laa
    4/27
    Filed 5/5/10
    Sent to S.C. reporter 9/2/10
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-03185-AD

Citation Numbers: 2010 Ohio 4231

Judges: Borchert

Filed Date: 5/5/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014