Wilburn v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. , 2016 Ohio 796 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Wilburn v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 
    2016-Ohio-796
    .]
    ANDREW WILBURN                                         Case No. 2015-00752-AD
    Plaintiff                                       Clerk Mark H. Reed
    v.
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF
    TRANSPORTATION
    Defendant
    {¶1} Plaintiff Andrew Wilburn (hereinafter “plaintiff”) filed this claim on August 25,
    2015 to recover damages which occurred when his 2006 Ford Fusion struck a pothole
    on August 8, 2015 while he was traveling on US 23 in Delaware County, Ohio. The
    pothole struck by plaintiff was actually located on the berm or shoulder of US 23 at
    approximately mile marker 15.0. This road is a public road maintained by the Ohio
    Department of Transportation (hereinafter “ODOT”).                  Plaintiff’s vehicle sustained
    damages in the amount of $529.47. Plaintiff maintains a collision insurance deductible
    of $500.00.
    {¶2} In order to recover on a claim for roadway damages against ODOT, Ohio
    law requires that a motorist/plaintiff prove all of the following:
    {¶3} That the plaintiff’s motor vehicle received damages as a result of coming
    into contact with a dangerous condition on a road maintained by ODOT.
    {¶4} That ODOT knew or should have known about the dangerous road
    condition.
    {¶5} That ODOT, armed with this knowledge, failed to repair or remedy the
    dangerous condition in a reasonable time.
    {¶6} In this claim, the Court finds that the plaintiff did prove that his vehicle
    received damages and that those damages occurred as a result of the plaintiff’s vehicle
    coming into contact with a dangerous condition on a road maintained by ODOT.
    Case No. 2015-00752-AD                      -2-              MEMORANDUM DECISION
    {¶7} The next element that a plaintiff must prove to succeed on a claim such as
    this is to show that ODOT knew or should have known about this dangerous condition.
    Based on the evidence presented, the Court is unable to find that ODOT had actual
    knowledge of the dangerous condition.
    {¶8} In the Investigation Report filed November 20, 2015, ODOT indicated that
    the location of the incident was on US 23, at mile marker 15.00 in Delaware County.
    This section of the roadway on US 23 has an average daily traffic count of between
    21,240 and 27,530 vehicles. Despite this volume of traffic, ODOT had received no
    notice of a pothole on this section of the roadway prior to plaintiff’s incident. Thus, the
    Court is unable to find that ODOT knew about the pothole.
    {¶9} However, what is critical in this matter is that the pothole struck by the
    plaintiff was located on the berm and not on the traveled portion of US 23.
    {¶10} The Supreme Court of Ohio has consistently held that ODOT is not liable
    when a driver encounters a hazard off the traveled portion of the road. See Turner v.
    Ohio Bell, 
    118 Ohio St. 3d 215
    , 
    2008-Ohio-2010
    . ODOT may only be liable for a hazard
    off the traveled portion of the roadway, when the condition creates a hazard on the
    traveled portion of the roadway. See Steele v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 
    162 Ohio App. 3d 30
    , 
    2005-Ohio-3276
    , Harris v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 
    83 Ohio App. 3d 125
    , 
    614 N.E. 2d 779
     (10th Dist. 1992). Therefore, even if ODOT failed to repair a hazard on the shoulder
    of US 23, plaintiff’s vehicle would not have been damaged had he stayed on the
    traveled portion of the road. Thus the Court need not determine whether or not ODOT
    knew or should have known about the road conditions existing on the shoulder of US 23
    on August 8, 2015.
    {¶11} Based on the facts of the case and prevailing law in Ohio as set out by the
    Ohio Supreme Court, plaintiff’s claim must fail.
    ANDREW WILBURN                               Case No. 2015-00752-AD
    Plaintiff                              Clerk Mark H. Reed
    Case No. 2015-00752-AD                       -3-              MEMORANDUM DECISION
    v.
    ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF                            DETERMINATION
    TRANSPORTATION
    Defendant
    Having considered all the evidence in the claim file, and for the reasons set forth
    in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor
    of the defendant. Court costs shall be absorbed by the Court.
    MARK H. REED
    Clerk
    Entry cc:
    Andrew Wilburn                                 Jerry Wray, Director
    221 Dogwood Drive                              Ohio Department of Transportation
    Delaware, Ohio 43015                           1980 West Broad Street
    Mail Stop 1500
    Columbus, Ohio 43223
    Filed 1/20/16
    Sent to S.C. Reporter 3/2/16
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-00752-AD

Citation Numbers: 2016 Ohio 796

Judges: Reed

Filed Date: 1/20/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2016