Kostra v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources , 2016 Ohio 798 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Kostra v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, 
    2016-Ohio-798
    .]
    GLORIA J. KOSTRA                                       Case No. 2015-00798-AD
    Plaintiff                                     Clerk Mark H. Reed
    v.
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
    RESOURCES
    Defendant
    {¶1} On September 14, 2015, Gloria Kostra (hereinafter “plaintiff”) filed a
    complaint in this Court against the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (hereinafter
    “ODNR”). A review of the pleadings and supporting documents reveals the following
    facts:
    {¶2} The plaintiff owns property adjacent to the Portage Lakes State Park in
    Summit County. On August 6, 2015, a storm damaged a cherry tree on plaintiff’s
    property, which then fell into the Iron Channel of the Portage Lakes creating a
    hazardous condition for boaters in the area. To remedy the situation, plaintiff contacted
    Barberton Tree Service of Norton, Ohio to have them remove the tree. Barberton did so
    at a cost $1,800, which was billed to the plaintiff. Plaintiff now seeks to have ODNR pay
    the costs of the tree removal on the theory that since the tree landed on ODNR’s
    property, it is thus their responsibility to keep the state waterways safe for marine travel,
    and not the legal obligation of a private citizen.
    {¶3} The plaintiff’s argument, while well-reasoned, is not consistent with the law.
    As the owner of the tree, she was solely responsible for the maintenance of the tree,
    which would include the costs of the removal of the tree should it fall on another
    persons’ property. Merely because the property in this case belongs to ODNR, does
    not relieve the plaintiff from her responsibility under the law. Surely, if the tree fell onto
    the property of an adjoining homeowner, the plaintiff would not argue that the
    IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO
    homeowner would be responsible for the costs of removing her tree. The same law that
    would prevail in the case where the property owner is a private citizen applies here as
    well.
    {¶4} Based on the foregoing, the plaintiff’s claim must be dismissed.
    IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO
    GLORIA J. KOSTRA                              Case No. 2015-00798-AD
    Plaintiff                            Clerk Mark H. Reed
    v.                                   ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE
    DETERMINIATION
    OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
    RESOURCES
    Defendant
    Having considered all the evidence in the claim file, and for the reasons set forth
    in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor
    of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff.
    MARK H. REED
    Clerk
    cc:
    Gloria J. Kostra                               Charles G. Rowan
    309 Guys Run Road                              Ohio Department of Natural Resources
    Akron, Ohio 44319                              2045 Morse Road, D-3
    Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693
    Filed 1/22/16
    Sent to S.C. Reporter 3/2/16
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-00798-AD

Citation Numbers: 2016 Ohio 798

Judges: Reed

Filed Date: 1/22/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/2/2016