King v. Palmer , 62 Okla. 299 ( 1916 )

Where the plaintiffs in error have briefed their cause, and the defendants in error have filed no brief, nor offered any excuse for a failure so to do, and the extension of time allowed them in which to file brief has expired, and the brief of plaintiffs in error indicates that there are errors in the record, and the authorities therein cited, seem to support their contention, the cause will be reversed and remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.