-
The law as stated in this opinion is in direct conflict with the well-considered opinion in Stork et al. v. Duval etal., decided by this court in 1898, and reported in
7 Okla. 213 ,54 P. 453 , and no reference is made to said cause. See, also, Farriss et al. v. Deming Investment Co.,5 Okla. 496 ,49 P. 926 , and Flanagan v. Forsythe,6 Okla. 225 ,50 P. 152 . In my opinion the contract in question constitutes a lien created by contract of the owner, and comes within rule stated in Meinhold v. Walters,102 Wis. 393 ; Fuller v. Hunt, 48 Iowa, 163; Dickerson v. Bridges, 147 Mo. 235; Orr v. H. Ulyatt,23 Nev. 134 , 43 P. 916; Lang v. Morey,40 Minn. 396 ; Forgy v.Merryman et al.,14 Neb. 513 ; Weber v. Laidler,26 Wn. 144 , 66 P. 400; Newkirk v. Marshall et al.,35 Kan. 77 ; St.Louis Mining Milling Co. v. Montana Co.,171 U.S. 656 .
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 91 P. 1040, 19 Okla. 502
Judges: IRWIN, J.:
Filed Date: 9/20/1907
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023